It’s obvious that this person is the most invested in the game. I will say out of my initial prediction (Anagram/Darth/Yawn) that this slot is the towniest, but I still don’t like it. They were part of the leading force to a townie, have some odd posts, and have some interactions with a few people that I don’t quite like. If the people demand it I will case this read further, but this is a wolf read for me.
I expect my reads to change up depending on flips because I am probably misclearing/accusing someone here, but I don’t think things like not asking to go to heaven aren’t super towny by itself. I do think this is the towniest of my scum reads, but heres the deal, if Anagram is a demon they have the most thread presence and thus won’t want to go to heaven in place of one of their slanker buddies
Wouldn’t Anagram have that mindset as town anyway? It’s a chat of slankers, we wouldn’t be able to solve much without them actually looking into things and getting explanations.
And if Anagram were a demon, they could easily leave and watch the thread burn.
Wow. Even after all the ISOs gorta made?
How rude of you to still scumread him (and basically everyone else) after he had spent so much effort in making those!
Okay so caffeine isn’t really doing the trick. This is not as detailed as I wanted it to be, but its my true thoughts nonetheless.
Opener goes straight to the chase. It’s a very early-game vote, but they back it up with more than just “gut” which is hard to come by at the start of the game.
We had the same view here.
They saw the Trivial vote as opportunistic, and, after seeing their reasoning for it, went back on this. Shows true progression. Not inherently townie, but it shows that they are actually reading the thread chronologically.
We had the same view here as well.
This is a townie pov. I don’t think they were posting simply to hit the post-requirement, as Wazza was saying. Everything they posted had content and showed their progression in real-time.
Realizing their bias and admitting they should leave Zone as null. This might be “hedgy” but it feels genuine.
Something I do want to see from Yawn is how their read progressed on Wazza. During day one they stated they didn’t see any agenda from Wazza, yet at SoD2 they called it blatant. (Which, if you read our earlier takes on EoD, I can agree with). I want them to explain this though.
Same as when they realized their bias on Zone, this reads as genuine.
Shows up at EoD with a quick quip and doesn’t attempt to get people on the wagon they are on other than asking Wazza to sheep him. I just don’t see a wolf not caring about EoD this much. Theres no agenda here.
It feels natural and relaxed. They’re so nonchalant.
The other head of Yawn feels just as townie. There is a jump in playstyle between the two, and this head takes the time to do an ISO-dive on Raven while the other head prefers to post thoughts as they come. Even with a difference in playstyle, their mindset feels the same. We mindmelded on quite a few things in this large post.
I do wish they ended this post with some form of conclusion on Raven’s alignment. But their hedge doesn’t feel like its because they’re a wolf who doesn’t want to take a stance. Their thought-process is clear and shows precisely why they think some things could come from a villager and some could come from a wolf.
Yawn has been showing how their thoughts progress very transparently, rather than only providing takes when prompted. Nothing is padded or unnecessary. It feels pure, unstilted, and I don’t see any signs of agenda.
They’re just town.