[VFM] Purgatory III: The Reckoning! Finale. Demons Win!

[Yawn]

At least my posts are directed to try hunt scum instead of just bitching about someone else posting.

[Wazza]

My post a second ago was literally me scumhunting. At least I’m not spamming all my posts in order to reach my post count.

Not to mention, you aren’t scumhunting, you’re literally just relaying reactions that frankly, I don’t give a shit about.

[Anagram]

I’m not using this reasoning to clear anyone, I just think it is more likely scum is in the lower posters at the moment.

I don’t really know what happened in the Anonymous game.

~ Player 2

[Yawn]

Yeah Moleland has pinged me aswell.

[Anagram]

I mentioned to my partner last night I didn’t like how Yawn pushed on us and popped out of the thread.

However, I am really liking their recent posting so far, so I’m going bump them up into my town list.

It feels like town reading up and pointing things out as they come to them! I really like it!

~ Player 2

[Wazza]

@Anagram

However, I am really liking their recent posting so far, so I’m going bump them up into my town list.

It feels like town reading up and pointing things out as they come to them! I really like it!

However, I disagree. I feel like they’re only spam-speaking after the ping and after you decided to call scum in the low-posters.

[Yawn]

I disagree entirely with Darths readslists, I have almost the exact opposite apart from my slot.

However his reasons are actually pretty solid so I might have to reeval Trivial despite liking their tone.

[Anagram]

I mean, if I was under 20 posts, I’d try to get up to the limit too! I don’t want to get replaced out.

Their posts don’t feel like they’re just posting to post!

I’ll be back later, I’m going back to sleep.

~2

[Yawn]

Zones initial Wazza vote is weird but NAI for me as it’s sort of awkward as both alignments and I’m assuming it’s a lolZone thing.

@Zone_Q11

/vote Wazza

Because he is the first poster.

He then goes downhill a lot for me because he focuses on hypothetical and mech talk in almost all his posts till Trivial appears.

@Zone_Q11

Sort stuff out in the sense of: I don’t want to delay this phase any longer than it should be.
SoD/EoD is at 3 AM, so I’d rather like a hammer.

@Zone_Q11

Demons could technically hammer a Lost Soul to Hell, but doing so would out themselves, so we can always be assured that a quickhammer will never happen unless it was done by consent of the majority.

@Zone_Q11

And post about what? Whether it is good or bad, you have to start doing something if you ever want to get people start talking.

This may be me being bias because I’m town reading trivial and dislike raven but Zone giving no content and then voting Ravens (my scumreads) voter (Trivial, my townlean) doesn’t sit well with me. Having said that this is a pretty awful point as I’m relying too much on preflip associations so maybe I should just leave Zone as null.

I also found it weird how Zone was obsessed with “why you townread me lollll”. When I’m townread I’m like “yeah duh you’re townreading me I’m town why the fuck wouldnt you townread me”. His questioning of townreads on him seems awkward and self-aware.

But yeah I’m voting Raven and would like to see Raven die. If Raven mafia I’ll vote Trivial for Heaven. If not I’ll reevaluate of course.

[Yawn]

By the way Yawn 2 has not posted yet, I have all been the same person.

[Wazza]

@Yawn

But yeah I’m voting Raven and would like to see Raven die. If replays mafia I’ll vote Trivial for Heaven. If not I’ll reevaluate of course.

I don’t understand this sentence at all.

Specifically with the replays mafia part, it’s like you’re in anonymous FM and accusing me.

[Yawn]

That was either autocorrect or typo.

[Wazza]

Gotcha.

[darth_tabor]

@Anagram

That’s not how gun-to-head works, buddy.

Yes I get the concept of gun-to-head, however, making reads without any basis is not something I like to do, nor is it productive. Wanting to have my thoughts together is not a crime. Also, I’m surprised you jump on this here considering you let it slide with An_Gorta_Partai.

@Anagram

Your earlier self-meta stated that you usually “just throw in analysis when I see stuff that’s relevant,” yet you now feel the need to re-read the entire game, even though you clearly didn’t see anything as relevant before.
While I usually like when players re-read the thread to provide content:
Earlier in my post, I mentioned that not providing takes when asked to, gun-to-head, allows wolves the time they need to not goof-up.
Part of me feels like this is exactly what you did.
You took that time.

Again, I don’t see how taking my time is a bad idea, I’d rather post productively that not contribute at all.
Regarding my earlier self-meta, it’s come to my attention that that aspect of my play style likely won’t work in this game due to the low volume of posts. In previous games, I’ve done said play style and usually did the full thread read after about 1000 posts, but clearly this isn’t going to happen here any time soon.

@Anagram

I find it interesting that you didn’t feel the need to mention that you liked their take, when you saw it.
The last thing I read regarding my slot (which is what Yawn’s take was on) was this:

I believe (correct me if I’m wrong) my first appearance wasn’t near Yawn’s. I don’t like pulling random comments on things that far back from my interaction with the thread, that’s what my thread reads are for.

@Anagram

Hedge! And you never mentioned us (the hydra heads) speaking to eachother, and how you felt about it - which was the basis of Yawn’s take.

I notice you reached back to my first post for this comment, not sure I get why other than to point out this hedge that we already knew was there. For my POV, the hydra heads speaking to each other is part of the thread filling, which you most definitely did.

@Anagram

You dislike that Trivial had no reasoning for their initial vote, and they simply dropped it. Is this not what Moleland did with Raven? You having a read on one but not the other, for this reasoning, doesn’t make a whole lot of sense to me.

You make a fair point here. Moleland’s posts didn’t really stick out to me, I’ll have to go back and take a look at this one though.

@Anagram

We may have rejected the inactivity hunt, as we view it as useless, but we definitely didn’t leave the thread stagnant. In fact, we ended up voting someone 10 minutes after this, but not for the purpose of an inactivity hunt.

The thread certainly wasn’t active because of this vote. You seem to take the inactivity hunt as meaning scum are definitely there, when ultimately that’s not the point of it. Hunting the inactives is more likely to draw them out when they are accused, providing more discussion and more content to actually game solve on.
I hardly find that you are game solving when a large chunk of your posts are suggestions for how other people should be playing instead of pushes.

@Anagram

@darth_tabor

the weird dialogue between the two heads felt disingenuous

Please expand.
Many people have pointed this out, and I am not inclined to believe that you believe this, as it is very easy to echo others.
You did not point this out earlier, and according to your earlier self-meta, it must not have been very relevant and didn’t stand out.

The dialogue was unusual, but again I was not in thread and it would not have been productive to go back and state that take earlier, when then I could’ve easily written it off as a joke. However, it’s not just that that comes off in this manner. It seems a lot of your posts are directed towards this people pleasing concept. You inconsistently push people, opting instead to take this ‘mentor’ role and offer advice on how they should be playing. A villager would be analyzing that play style instead of just offering how they should change it to look better.

[Yawn]

This is where I’m at right now AMA:

Yawn

Anagram
Trivial
Wazza

An_gorta_pratai
Darth Tarbor

Moleland
Zone_Q11
Raven

[Anagram]

Thank you!

~ Player 2

[Anagram]

I will wait for Player 1 to respond to this. I haven’t really read you in depth.

~ Player 2

[Anagram]

This is pretty much where I’m at as well!

~ Player 2

[Wazza]

@Yawn

Anagram
Trivial
Wazza

Why am I in your townreads?

[Yawn]

You dont have an aggressive agenda like you often do as scum and I liked you being annoyed at me, it felt genuine and I’m not sure mafia Wazza would react that way.