[VFM] Purgatory III: The Reckoning! Finale. Demons Win!

[an_gorta_pratai]

@Anagram

…This is all you managed to come up with after a re-read?
It was a weak townread based off of the “dumbness” of his opener.

I made it to post 30 before sleeping

[DatBird]

Reminder theres less than four hours left, and a good few are under the 20 on topic posts. Get to it!

[an_gorta_pratai]

@Raven

sorry, then.

/vote Wazza
@clonedcheese
tell me, what do you think of zone’s suggestion.

I am currently at post 36, but why were we voting up Wazza on a whim like that?

[Moleland]

I’m not sure I’m liking the wagon on anagram

It’s weird that I feel his posts ping me either way on them. Maybe it’s to do with the different heads idk

[Wazza]

@an_gorta_pratai

I am currently at post 36, but why were we voting up Wazza on a whim like that?

Because people just felt like it.

[DatBird]

VC

Voted	Voters	Votes
darth_tabor	Zone_Q11	1/5
Raven	Yawn, Anagram	2/5
Anagram	Raven, Trivial, darth_tabor	3/5
Moleland	Wazza	1/5

[darth_tabor]

I feel like I haven’t seen enough from you to form an opinion yet, mind commenting on my reads post while I take a closer look at your slot?

@darth_tabor

Ok so I did a full thread read again to get more solid takes since I’m not finding much content to point out in thread. Here’s some reads, take them as you will:

[an_gorta_pratai]

@Raven

admittedly I was under the impression that Zone was calling for a quickhammer on anyone, but the idea I shouldnt vote isnt good. Voting in an hour early into the game is where to start.

Maybe I am different, but I don’t vote early in the day. That’s just my opinion, as I would rather place my vote somewhere I want than vote just to place a vote. In the past when I vote on a wagon I don’t believe in or my gut says otherwise they flip exactly what I think they are most of the time (at post 42)

[an_gorta_pratai]

Seems like a stupid reason because if you are a lost soul we are allowing a demon to escape hell. We do not random vote guys. We always give a reason as to why we are voting, especially in a game where we have to vote lost souls into heaven and demons into hell

[darth_tabor]

Reread moleland and they feel like a scumlean instead of a neutral. They haven’t really contributed much, only to make their random opening (still unexplained but assumed RVS) vote and take a neutral stance on anyone else’s opinion. It seems like they don’t have much of their own opinions and are just contradicting others.

Depending on their response to my reads post, I might put them as more of a scumlean than you, but we’ll see.

[Moleland]

Sure thing.

Something that comes to mind is that at least one of Raven, yawn and Anagram is a wolf. I’m sure of it

[darth_tabor]

That seems entirely contradictory to the RVS strategy. They’re not meant to have that much meaning, just a tactic to get people to talk and get more information

[an_gorta_pratai]

@Wazza

Zone doesn’t just ‘vote people randomly’, that’s not Zone. Zone plans on tunnelling someone until they’re dead and they will make sure of that.

This is exactly right, so Zone has to have a reason for voting Wazza. @Zone_Q11 what reason are you voting Wazza? Zone is also usually aggressive

[Moleland]

@darth_tabor

Zone

They seem to have mild disinterest, not in playing, but in acknowledging the game isn’t moving much and not expecting activity to pick up drastically. When they pushed Anagram, they had an inquisitive tone, doesn’t seem like agenda pushing here. I’m not entirely sure on this slot, but seems generally good and definitely not my target for this Hell Phase.

Seems a fine read. They are a null to me at this point

@darth_tabor

Raven

Some takes have been weird, but seems to genuinely be trying to scum hunt. Their posts have a lot of relevant content and analysis which is really good considering the thread is kind of dead

I have a nullscum read here myself, but I’m not interested in banishing this slot

@darth_tabor

Wazza

I know some of y’all don’t like metareading, but they seem to be up to their usual stuff. Which doesn’t help me, I’ve seen them do this as town and scum.

Hmm, I feel like Wazza is being opportunist with his vote. I have a scumlean myself

@darth_tabor

Trivial

I don’t like their thread entrance. They didn’t seem to provide reasoning for the initial Anagram vote, just dropped it. The Zone tunnel was also not a good look for them. This is not a strong read though.

I have no opinion on them right now myself.

@darth_tabor

Anagram

I don’t like the vibes I’m getting from this slot. They seem to be focusing on being friendly rather than scum-hunting despite claiming that they want to scum hunt. They rejected Zone’s inactivity hunt, which I don’t like. Even if you think people shouldn’t be scumread for being inactive, it’s still a

I agree with this uneasy feeling they are giving off. Really should Iso them but have no energy to do so today.

[Moleland]

If Anagram flips we get some decent info in the people voting them

[an_gorta_pratai]

Here’s the deal, I don’t like RVS votes. They don’t show alignment and are just haha funny meme votes, which is just not how I like to play. If you want to generate conversation just talk

[Moleland]

Wrong. Reactions can be quite informative

[darth_tabor]

To each their own I guess. I’m not a fan of RVS either, but I understand it can be useful and don’t question it to much in practice

[darth_tabor]

Would you say most if not all of your reads are null right now? Also could you explain more your Wazza read? Is it more than OMGUS?

[Moleland]

I generally pick up my scum opinions via vca and I haven’t looked hard enough at most posts to really form strong opinions

In regards to wazza, he was like “Oh… There’s nothing I can do” to suddenly, " Lol, vote this guy" with no real progression. Seems fake