Warrior Cats FM [6/15] - Dark Forest wins!

Yes? You did?

this wasnā€™t used to clear me??? lol

ā€œTotally in the clearā€ being that you werenā€™t scummy for hesitating on Marissa

Iā€™m going back to the original post for that btw

I wasnā€™t

tho

im not scummy for that lol

Right
Because that was never my accusation

and?

ā€¦ meaning you never actually addressed my original point

if the context wasnā€™t about me hesitating marshal it wouldnā€™t of been an argument of me faking random bullshit or whatever

ok and I did after

And instead of arguing against it in good faith you used the barrier of ā€œoh well Iā€™m actually doing a good thingā€ to try and ward off any reads against you

so yeah I did

this is complete bs

im warding off your YOUR read on me because its based off of opinion therefore I donā€™t like it because me myself knows I wasnā€™t faking

ā€¦ yes. Yes you did.

ok I need to grab lunch rq

pls no hammer again

Iā€™m trying to not get sarcastic, and itā€™s getting difficult, so Iā€™m going to stop after this. Any gameplay other than mech is based off of opinions. This isnā€™t botc. This is fm.

what fucking point are you even trying to prove

this has nothing to do with your argument and it looks like you are just trying to talk about how I misread your argument at first I clearly have updated that based off of what arctic told me so literally do something called lay off it lol instead of needing to push in my face how dumb and stupid I am so literally stop as it has nothing to do with my alignment and you are literally trying to prove me wrong on something ive been aware that ive been wrong on since arctic clarified it to me fffs

THERES. a huge difference between saying someone looks scummy because of actions and words that are ai and saying im faking my hesitance on marshal bruh I can scum read someone because their words have agenda or they boosted up a teammate to look better etc and I can also scum read someone if I read their post with a different meaning but if I base my entire fucking vote based off of that and not actual reasoning it isnā€™t valid