Didn’t we have 5 though
Ive explained this concern before
Like we have a poe thats likely to contain a lot of wolves to work with today
Our goal is to exe a wolf today since its physically impossible to exe all three today 
Why intentionally widen it to include 3 more ppl
we technically did
but not really
the fifth slot kept alternating and I always treated it as “kill later not now”
How do you scroll up to read my post and then not scroll up enough to form any opinion whatsoever on the PoE, though
Because I don’t think out of the 4 or 5 people in the PoE, one or two of them are even wolves
Meaning were one wolf short
So if we have like a PoE of 4 and only 2 are wolves we automatically lose by never reevaluating
what makes me more lw than nuclear
If there are 3 wolves out of 4 in the PoE, we have one ML, but then we can’t go “wow I have no idea who the last wolf is” because we never considered that someone in the PoE would flip town
because im reading posts that are after me posting
You’re literally not even solving at this point tbh
Your push on nuclear looks worse than her push on you
And looking at mins posts, you are never packwolf with Whysper, but you could certainly still be LW with her
Even if we dont have 100% of the wolves in the poe right now
Its still good to work with a smaller poe, and work off of flips
Again im trying to catch one wolf at a time since ive rarely seen the alternative work
Widening the poe increases the chance that all wolves are in the poe, but it also increases the chance that each individual member of the poe is town
Which
Bad
im literally asking
and I wouldnt say im solving alot but trying to figure out stuff definitely counts as a tiny bit of solving
We don’t have that many flips to work off, haven’t you noticed?if we ML today we’re in LyLo tomorrow.
ive asked about a ton of things