This is the most stupidest idea ever.
No lynch will screw town over in any circumstance as me or H_Hjasik will get murdered tonight.
No Lynch is best for town.
Hjasik hasn’t been murdered despite being “confirmed”
You haven’t despite being “confirmed”
We should absolutely be no lynching and seeing who scum kill here. If they kill Wazza then they want to mislynch me and I need to adjust
If they kill me then they want to get rid of “confirms” or figured I am safe
If they kill Max then I know I am right on my theory and then figure out if it’s lurker or Wazza whose story changed.
/vote Math
A Confirmed Lurker, If it’s a no-lynch, the remaining people have a 50/50 chance
…???
You just stated why not to vote here.
A) I know you’re wrong
B) By forcing scum to murder someone we have eliminated a potential wrong lynch and serves to make the case stronger.
C) I am not scum but even if I was then you’d be best served by no lynching to continue your conf bias/scumminess tomorrow when you have one less person to incorrectly convince.
There should be no voting going on here.
i do agr ee th at no lyn ching is a go od id ea tbh, or at lea st it wi ll ma ke it eas ier on us
is no ly nch a via ble vo te @PoisonedSquid ?
gon na say th at hj is pr ob to wn btw, or he’s ju st a god lur ker. . . . i ca n’t re ad him -_-
gg scumi was actually asleep when light was lynched tho
and i did want to wait until i got home to post but that juicy 2/3 votes