Watch Your Mouth!: Sophomore Year (3/17) - Day 5 - Planters (Mafia) Win!

[Wazza]

lmaoooo

@Insanity

To be honest I am not so sure on why Wazza is suddenly this defensive for me

I ain’t defensive for you, honestly I couldn’t frankly care about you. However, you’re voting my top scumread and I’d like to keep it that way.

[Jane]

@Wazza

I ain’t defensive for you, honestly I couldn’t frankly care about you.

Then stop defending them, or give a reason why they’re town.

[sulit]

VOTECOUNT (but fancier this time)

Accused	Voted by	Votes
SirDerpsAlot	Esquiddy	1/9
Trochilidae	Trochilidae	1/9
Surge	Surge	1/9
EliThePsycho	Insanity, Wazza	2/9
Whysper	Luxy, Moleland, Alice	3/9
Moleland	SirDerpsAlot, Whysper, Marshal	3/9
Wazza	Jane	1/9
Not voting	EliThePsycho, Appelsiini, PokemonKidRyan	3
BUTTER	ROLL	1/9

---

IF I MISSED A VOTE
PING ME

[Insanity]

So are you saying that every wagon that I started should gain traction .-.

@Jane

You’ve barely done anything at all

And uh, what makes you think like that?

[Trochilidae]

@SirDerpsAlot @Whysper @Marshal
please get your votes off mole, he’s claiming HS and shooting jane here

[Moleland]

@Jane

You’ve barely done anything at all,

What have you done, oh wise one?

[Wazza]

@Jane

Why are you harddefending them when you have literally given 0 reasons why they’re town?

I’ve had them in my townleans for a while.
They’re voting my top scumread.
And I’m not harddefending him, I’m pushing against you. While I’m using their situation you placed them in to push on you, doesn’t mean I’m defensive for him.

@Jane

Then stop defending them, or give a reason why they’re town.

The post literally says ‘I’m not defensive for you’.

There’s a difference between me defending a player (See me with Insanity in SFoL63) and me using your joke that you call a push on a player (Which you ALREADY GAVE UP ON and voted yet ANOTHER Vanity wagon) to push on you.

[Jane]

@Insanity

that I started

No.

I voted Mole, they bought time with an HS claim.
I tried to vote PKR… nobody cared.
I vote you, everybody calls it horrible and starts defending you with 0 reasoning.

[Jane]

Read my ISO lol.

[Wazza]

And then you post an even worse vote on me.

After you calling out multiple vanity wagons.

H
y
p
o
c
r
i
t
e

[Moleland]

I did. I wasn’t impressed

[Jane]

I think I’ll just ignore you until Mole’s flip, since you’re making 0 sense this game.

[an_gorta_pratai]

@Moleland

Why’s that?

@Trochilidae

and who has she voted again? i can’t find a recent VC

Whysper voted mole with the reason “I found his posts suspicious” and never explained why

@Wazza

If Mole is scum, he has no valid reason to claim and throw Whysper, who would be his scumpartner under the bus like this since Whysper is clearly the expected other lynch that isn’t Mole.

If Mole is legit, he will probably shoot Whysper anyway, and to be added onto that, Mole will flip tonight no matter what (Scum will kill him or HS will kill him).

This read is also bad. In JOAT2 Mole planned everything out so his teammates look good from his lynch, so why not do it here? I also recall Mole talking about killing Jane

[Insanity]

@Jane

I vote you, everybody calls it horrible and starts defending you with 0 reasoning.

If you provided a reason, then perhaps it will be less horrible from the start @_@

[Wazza]

Everyone else has made sense of what I’ve said.

@an_gorta_pratai

This read is also bad. In JOAT2 Mole planned everything out so his teammates look good from his lynch, so why not do it here? I also recall Mole talking about killing Jane

That’s not a read, that’s the situation we find ourself in tonight? Did you even read the post.

[an_gorta_pratai]

I still think it’s a bad way to read the situation

[Wazza]

how…?

[Wazza]

That’s literally what happens tonight (Minus the shooting Whysper part)

[an_gorta_pratai]

I am saying don’t clear Whysper if Mole flips scum here. In JOAT2 Mole’s execution was planned to make those teammates look good and it worked until Eli and Intensify subbed in

[SirDerpsAlot]

Where