Nice try. Neither have you on my points and I donāt need to respond to yours because you havenāt made any points worth responding to.
Iāll go and quote them for you in case you are vision impaired
I think heās playing fine and is bringing up valid (though wrong) points on you, plus heās doing it with conviction
What didnāt I respond too Leafia?
You try again. All youāre doing is throwing shade on me to make me seem scummy. I think thatās why you wanted my readslist so soon too. Because you knew I wouldnāt have many reads on people and so you could throw shade on me.
Overall, Leafiaās worldview here makes no sense to me, she actively and completely goes against concensus yet has demonstrated less than a solid grasp on the game, having over half the game as null and only 5 current townreads. If she was town and believed the current towncore was bad, she would make an effort to find players she would towncore and build her knowledge of the game so that she can expose the deepwolves. Instead she shades the entire towncore, arguing we should all be shot tomorrow during ITA but not suggesting any replacements for the position, indicating her intention is not to solve but to prevent a towncore formation. The current ātowncore-ishā is all scum to her apparently, and someone still reads Thunal as null despite large amounts of interaction between the two. This indicates to me that Leafia is trying to be seen as a towny to ābreak the moldā and reshape the game where she has authority, whilst simultaneously saving her scumbuddy Surge . I can easily see them both flipping scum here and I do not think Leafiaās thoughts are real ones at all to say the least. Not to mention her readlist is pretty textbook wolfy with all the nulls, but I did force her to do it so its probably a weaker tell here.
Note: Iām using towncore as my personal towncore but I do believe weāre relatively concensus town at this point.
And youāve responded to nothing in this Leafia
You arenāt going to trick people into thinking Iām a wolf this way Luxy.
Because you knew I wouldnāt have many reads on people and so you could throw shade on me.
I gave you the benefit of the doubt for that and Iām not pushing you on the basis of that.
Iām pushing you on the basis of trying to flip the gamestate without having a valid gamestate replacement nor grasp on a solid amount of players for it that a townie would have if they were acting in good faith
What didnāt I respond to Leafia?
Why would I let a game state that I donāt believe in continue if Iām a villager?
this argument is sucking air out of the thread
@Leafia @Luxy
Iām stopping you two from talking about each other for the next 6 hours
I donāt care how strong your scumread is itās not deserving of destroying threadstate like this
I am going to respond to her last question
Yeah, youāre right Mist. Luxy can be killed in ITAs tomorrow.
Because a villager considers they may be wrong, and would try and find other villagers and examine the current one to find the things wrong with it.
How do you know the gamestate is wrong enough to make a such a bold attempt to completely change it.
Only a wolf does that
cool
now that thatās out of the way
I think intensify and apprentice are both slipping much farther under the radar than they should be and are both good wagons today
intensify and apprentice
Yeah I can agree to kill both of these tbh
But I think Surge needs to be dealt with
/vote Surge
As much as I disliked the early formation of this wagon, I think itās probably the only valid play today
iāve seen talk that Apprenticeās jumping in the wagon was wolfy and opportunistic to get a town mislynched
unfortunately theyāve barely posted anything so i canāt ask them about this which is quite frustrating