Wild West FM - Day 5 - Mafia Win!

The main reason I wasn’t able to participate today was because we got an announcement from the European team that a test-run will be performed today at 1 pm UTC. They gave us just a few hours before the deadline and I am trying to rush to meet it.

…this is a very bad way to village.

What if the leaders are wolves? That’s effectively one of the main reasons why SFoL63 was a scum win.

Wait but isn’t that how you played scum before you gave up in SFOL61 or whatever it was?

My bad.

What things made you think I was scum?

I don’t find it NAI to intentionally flood the thread with fluff posts even when people ask you not to since it just makes it harder for others to catch up each time.

I personally think that just Light not obeying me even after I voted him is too bold a move for scum to make.

so this would be getting into TWTBAW behaviour is what you’re saying?

I give my views and argue them against the leader if I feel the leader is wrong. But if you expect me to fight for thread control from someone I agree with, I’m not going to. Never have/never will.

Exactly.

To a degree, yes. But I was ‘Town metaing’ there and scumread someone correctly too.

If you think I’m scum, just shoot me :slight_smile:

Essentially, when I try to look at the thread, I attempt to take notice of three things:

Those who drive discussion
Those who post nothing
Those who pad.

In turn, I try to clear out people slowly as they post more information. Currently, you are in the camp who pads and plays on the sideline. It may look like you are driving discussion, but you are not. This usually is indicative of a mafia player who may not know the boundaries of what may be TMI, but still wishes to participate.

Where am I doing those things. Quote me

thank you for clarifying i was wondering if i had pegged the terminology right!
i am however interested to see if whysper’s reads change when done with the thread

1 Like

I don’t know about that.
If they were out to get them then I wouldn’t be the top wagon.

@ChopChop I’m waiting for you to show me places I’ve been Lamist.

Essentially, this entire time has just been you asking around for “What’s your confidence on Surge, Vulgard?” and some side comments on progression.

i’ve seen PKR a sort of “policy” target in past games but i’m not seeing that as much here? i can’t tell if he’s acting noticeably different

Target Votes Voters
Surge 5/13 Vulgard, PokemonKidRyan, Apprentice, Moleland, Wazza
Whysper 2/13 Sulit, Luxy
Geyde 1/13 Geyde
Intensify 1/13 Intensify
Light 1/13 ash4fun
Moleland 3/13 Mist1422, yee-claw, Surge
Yee-claw 4/13 deadbananas0, Leafia, RangerCecil, Thunal33
an_gorta_pratai 1/13 Centuries
Light 1/13 Whysper
Not Voting 6 Clonedcheese, Trochilidillae, an_gorta_pratai, Universal, Appelsiini, Light

(Shoot, I am running out of memes)

1 Like

I’m not seeing any LAMIST in your ISO Mole