I don’t even understand why
A) Have villagers actually play the game. Enough with excuses such as the damn trees or whatnot. Like Gorta, Magnus, and cheese always end up getting stuck in the PoE because just they lowpost and don’t bother interacting with people.
B) Have people stop using their vigs for dumb reasons such as OMGUS or grudges. Every damn game lately we’ve been having people vig clear villagers for some stupid shit like that.
C) Literally stop defending people for no reason. Like back in 2018 when the site had a very strong town play people would never defend suspicious players because we’d just lynch them on site. The fact that everyone will just flock to a obvious newbwolf’s defense makes it harder to lynch wolves and harder to find their partners.
Three points off the top of my head.
1 Like
It’s like a car
Just because the road doesn’t care doesn’t mean that I shouldn’t stop for my own personal health
Ah I didn’t realize that was what you meant
In that case feel free to give non-asshole criticism?
Basically, yeah. You can’t make accurate shotlists with the village play this match.
Like when you had Leafia literally playing like a wolf with a green rolecard or PKR OMGUS shooting a blatantly obvtown town leader, there’s no way in hell that Marshal or I would be able to clean this mess.
that game was in september 2017.
not a single person in this PM has any idea what you are talking about boomer
Exception, not the rule.
Literally every damn game we have villagers stuck in the PoE because they hard-defended a weak player that flipped wolf just because they were weak.
Some people always get killed due to lack of the ability to defend themselves (either due to low activity or a lack of skill in that specific matter)
And then they hate it
and instead of trying to change that they just yell at people when they try to push someone who has had a weak game and is not good at defending themselves because they think that those people are in the same exact position as them
I don’t think ‘don’t defend suspicious players’ is actionable advice because … presumably if they thought [player X] was suspicious they wouldn’t be defending them
I think a better principle would be ‘if you want to defend someone, explain your reasons for believing them to flip town’ and ‘just because Player A is pushing Player B, does not mean Player A is a wolf trying to miselim Player B’