If I haven’t, I want to.
Because I enjoyed last game
/in
/in
MY NAME
ISN’T ALICE
BUT I’LL KEEP LOOKING
I’LL KEEP LOOKING
FOR WONDERLAND
I am also going to start playing YTTD to get a better grasp on how this game works
good have fun
YTTD Spoilers:
I’m so sad that I can’t just Item > Revolver > Shoot Q-Taro during the discussion of who should be the challenger (this is how far I’m up to rn)
I just realised something
Gin critisices their dad for drinking alcohol; which lines up perfectly with calling their child “Gin” since it’s also a type of alcohol. lol.
i can /in this if it starts on Wednesday or later
yttd spoiler i cant believe qtaro would kill everyone : /
YTTD spoiler. At least he gets character development later on.
I was thinking about it
Why doesn’t the Sacrifice get to choose someone to escape with them in this one?
I feel like negotiations with a Sacrifice involves enough of a risk and other factors that I believe it’d be fine.
iirc alice said it encourages throwing the trial in hopes that the sacrifice will pick you
this in itself is what makes it interesting so it’s a shame it had to be removed
but when you consider that people can just play suboptimally and fall back on the cop-out of assuming the sacrifice would just choose them to win, it’s probably not ideal
yes, that sucks a lot.
But think about it this way.
You’d be voting an ally.
At the cost of voting someone who’d pick you as the sacrifice, you are possibly condemning someone who could vote against others for you.
the problem is here you’re making the fatal assumption that the person in question would help you if you were in their shoes
which ties into the original problem being that they don’t have to choose you to win with them anyway… so you’re once again assuming that they will help you
i guess it boils down to whether you want to do the play which gives you a guarantee of not losing during the current round or doing the play which can get you a win now but can also kill you
i also feel like doing this is the sort of thing which encourages the unhealthy play of keeping people alive because they’re your friends rather than making genuinely informed decisions in regards to who it would be logical to keep alive
It’s a risk-reward scenario.
The Sacrifice approaching someone to help them with trust is risky, especially when you don’t know if everyone is even on your side with the Sacrifice card.
A person approaching in efforts of finding a Sacrifice is also risky, as it can lead to people distrusting the person who’s proposing.
All in all, I feel like it’s better having it like this.
this is why I cement myself with a wall of casing just knowing it’s a game.
Basically.
I wanted to minimize alliance-building as people do this a lot on this site’s miscs.
Like, we have people who outright forge evidence in DR to help their blackened friends escape so I really wanted to drive the point home that alliances bad.