What if I told you the 4th trade didn’t involve App at all
ikr
but considering we already determined PKR is not mechanically the most useful in the game, it’s also just a meh slot.
While True
Ici can also just Pop PKR whenever
like, its kind of a wasted lynch if we vote PKR here i feel like
not if I read into my tinfoil that I don’t want to say anything about, and just replace Mist’s slot with PKR (or anyone for that matter)
I actually did the fourth trade with Whysper, so Whysper’s the Sacrifice now.
Neat ain’t it
press X to doubt
i planned on telling them later
Before you ask
“But you were in PKR’s dorm blah blah”
Did you really forget I could teleport
I like how you guys decide to suddenly form a group to get Marl yeeted.
Anyways I just wanted to bring that up for fun.
like I don’t really think either of you is the MM so I’m not really sure what you’re trying to do here
(besides Intensify, he’s just trying to fulfill his wincon which is fine)
you literally have to push me as MM for this to work, you know
and you can’t if you admit to having had the sac card at least at some point in time
I mean my wincon is to live this chapter and make sure Whysper isn’t executed since they’re actually the Sacrifice so sure
no it’s true
i didn’t do the 4th trade and that’s why i’ve been pushing marl because it’s every man for himself now we don’t know where the sac card actually went
Oh no I definitely had the Sacrifice card, but Whysper has it now
to be completely honest I never thought you did the 4th trade
Of course if you don’t believe me, I would argue against voting Whysper, but I’m still just a little tiny bit salty from the whole betrayal thing so I wouldn’t stop you as much
i was gonna claim i knew who did the 4th trade
then i remember App claimed he was part of it
but hes lying, so yea, PKR has the sac, do what you want with that info
have to point out that this is a perspective slip
if whysper is the sacrifice why would killing them be a form of revenge
I determined already that there’s a close to 0% chance of Whysper being sacrifice, so no.