Your Turn To Die Misc - (12/20) - Chapter 2 END (THREAD 1)

the only other way to get Ici to kill PKR is just to trade him the sac card because it will literally force Ici to get rid of him.
so lol

Marshal, what’s your reasoning for believing this?

do you guys not think that if Ici were MM, she would’ve just killed PKR to get rid of the soulbind already? because having someone of the opposite alignment tied to you is pretty damning.

i’m trying so hard to weigh my options objectively but
i think the best play will upset everyone no matter what it is

Marl straight up isn’t happening

PKR very well might be

if you want to take shots at the group, kill PKR. They’ve said they’re willing to do it, ici isn’t going to kill him, and the other option is someone outside of the group.

I’d suggest you get on team kill-PKR and start arguing for that, it’s your next best bet

1 Like

marl is happening

you’re going to be beating a dead horse in a couple hours

i will die on this hill

you’ll die after your hill caves in

the sac wincon has to be more than 1, FMPoV, so we get at least 2 tries. Otherwise MM could just lie to get a sac killed and it’d be BS.

You’re outted MM regardless if PKR flips sac, but I find that incredbily unlikely and even then it’s still a +EV trade.

there is no point not trying to push this
like i am just going to die in exploration if it doesn’t happen
so what’s the point

i have put a target on my back for the rest of this game

kumagawa die

Look

If you’re going to go for marl, I’m going to probably be voting whysper because I prefer her out of marl/whysper

if you go for PKR, I’m going to vote with you

2 Likes

right but if it’s three sacrifices for MM to win, say, that means that if i were to out myself in Chapter 2 I have to get 2/3 of the next two trials to hit Sacrifice while nobody is listening to me

literally i gave him the exact same options and he refused

whysper is the sacrifice
intensify did the 4th trade with her

it satisfies all of his criteria but he still refuses because pigheadedness

forgot to tell you about this

this is a lie

your reasoning seems to be predicated on the number being two, and I don’t think that’s a proper assumption even if it is likely