Announcement: Updated Policy on Replacements

Forum Matches Discussion
#261

i second this angry face given we had a lot of funny shit in scum chat

although i was a bit more toxic in scumchat than i’d like to admit, i was also fully willing to take responsibility

3 Likes
#262

Yes but how is depriving anybody else not objectively bad

1 Like
#263

how tf were you toxic we tore ourselves apart

2 Likes
#264

im pretty sure i bashed on like

every single town slot

and amelia

#265

Well, yes.
But what is this supposed to prove? That metareads are mandatory for scum success?
We literally just mentioned alts above – you can create a new one for every game and it will be literally the same.

“I can’t predict what X will do because I don’t know how their mind works/who they are.”

1 Like
#266

Also mind you, scum still won WoW.
So like, what is this even supposed to prove.

#267

this convo is going in circles and i’ve realized i have absolutely zero stance either way
so time to perch atop the wall and mute the thread.

1 Like
#268

It proves that people not knowing your thought process can also be extremely bad.
You could also be townread as Town for not killing X because people would think as scum you wouldn’t kill X

#269

@anon6348071 I’m just gonna leave this by saying that if your gameplan is to do well as scum by repeating the same strategies and only fooling players that have actually seen them before rather than trying to outwit everybody in a social deduction game - you probably need a new gameplan

have a good one y’all :smiling_face_with_three_hearts:

1 Like
#270

imo, if the only reason you don’t want scum chat published is because you don’t want to be metaread, then that’s a pretty shitty reason

2 Likes
#271

Napoleon’s heal was absolutely useless the entire game
Granted chloe was never actually attacked
But they were paranoid chloe would die so he never could protect Leafia with his secondary ability

#272

But still a legitimate one.
If people would use less metareads, there would be no problem.

#273

Then be less metareadable

#274

i’ve never asked any of my players for permission to publish scum chat in my games
just kind of did it

anyone who’s been scum in any of my games knows that my scumcords come pre-formatted with like a dozen channels that make it very difficult to do things that you would want to stay hidden in the post game.

#275

That’s 100% on you if you can be easily metaread

#276

If chloe/Napoleon could predict Leafia’s thought process, Napoleon could’ve been healing Leafia from vig’s / using Holy Word: Serenity on Leafia

#277

but . . . i still have zero opinions on the matter.

#278

We have as policy that we take silence as agreement. But a “no” is a clear “no”.

#279

i’ve never given them the time to say anything
just posted the invite link along with the spreadsheet and randing philo doc instantly upon EoG

#280

I’m still not seeing how this is ‘bad’.
Yes, you are paranoid that LW will attack one of your members but they are a LW.
Signal them or figure out how to work with them – that’s the whole point of a Lost Wolf.

Uhh, could you rephrase this bit.

1 Like