Scum pushing a policy lynch dependent on talking in third person is weird and dumb and not something wolves do.
This game is going to be fun. I can tell.
Enigma likes the logic used for this read actually.
Your posts just don’t make sense to be honest. Your first couple are mostly fluff. You call votes on a 0 poster and yourself “good votes,” and then you get overly defensive when I call you out.
What are you doing this game?
Someone kill one of us please
Or you can just ignore it and… play the game. Just making suggestions.
Ha. What makes you think this is a fake argument between Enigma and Replay as opposed to a genuine one? Enigma sees nothing to suggest Enigma was involved in SvS there and would like a more detailed explanation.
Enigma knows you are focusing on Enigma to avoid giving real reads on the players.
Give real reads please.
Fuck
Iv been called out
Lemme go actually read
Of course they do. They’re not really meant to. It’s interesting that you’re scumreading me for them though
Define interesting.
Enigma finds Scum often use the word interesting to pretend to give reads. Interesting is pretty irrelevant when scum hunting.
Fair comment.
I’m trying to work out if this is scum clutching at straws or not. That’s why I’m interested
What do you mean.
Votecount
Voted | Voter | Count |
---|---|---|
Paparazzi | Shallow, Venus | 2/5 |
Replay | Enigma | 1/5 |
Enigma | Telephone, Paparazzi | 2/5 |
LoveGame | Babylon | 1/5 |
Venus | LoveGame | 1/5 |
Not Voting | Applause, Replay | 2/9 |
It’s RVS. I was seeing what kind if reaction I would get. Yours is intriguing me so far. I’m leaning scum a little at the moment, but we’ll see.
Also /Unvote
Enigma will vote Babylon for their unsubstantiated poor read about an SvS with Replay.
/vote Babylon
Enigma would also like Replay to place a vote as they are still suspicious.
I’m here
Oh it appeared.
Opinions on the game thus far?