Blood on the Forums: Trouble Brewing [Good wins]

Because he claimed soldier just because I claimed soldier

Why do you think an evil player would claim a class when they know thereā€™s already someone else claiming that class? Wouldnā€™t they want to not appear suspicious?

He canā€™t reply.

Not necessarily. Ccing someone in this setup initiates a thunderdome. If you win, youā€™ll pretty much have a fakeclaim for the rest of the game comfortably.
It seems a worthwhile risk when ccing a suspect.

Except that we have an Undertaker claim, so if theyā€™re sober, healthy, and Good then they would be able to point out that one player or the other is the real Soldier

Itā€™s a one-Shot use.

Stop trying to fake townslips

Iā€™m not! Eevee told me that

ā€¦are you sure you didnā€™t misinterpret what he said? Because thatā€™s ā€¦ not correct ā€¦

He said most classes are one-use

Okay, but that doesnā€™t mean that Undertaker is.

I said most classes can roll once.

Magnus really missinterpretes what Iā€™m saying.

1 Like

You said one-use!

How can you even interpret ā€œclasses are uniqueā€ to ā€œmost classes are one-shotā€

1 Like

In any case, Magnus, how does it affect your read to know that Isaac claimed privately to Eevee yesterday?

He didnā€™t. Eevee as good as said so.

Iā€™m interested which post you are refering to.

You are covering everything on me.

I did ask you if you want to swap claims with monk as soldier, that for sure yes.
I even tried to out you hard as monk, which obviously didnā€™t work.

But that was before Isaac claimed.

Monk being a target, and soldier which is immune to demon kills, perfect swap if it would work.

I even openly leaked in few places that you are monk.

Like @Simon was informed you are monk for example.

It was a good setup, shame it didnā€™t work.

But answer me - which post do you refer to when saying about one-shot undertaker.

Which post do you refer to when you say I said anything about Isaac?