Arctic is either a wolf at this point or a town so stupidly tunneled he shouldn’t be “towncore” anyways
i disagree with a number of his reads now but i don’t think he’s doing it in a wolfy way, he seems like he’s stuck in confbias mode which is annoying because i don’t really think it matters if i say anything
no you didn’t, you you only asked why people townread them and then posted the graph, followed by voting them
your reasons for scumreading them came from their response to you voting them for NO REASON
sulit is either mafia or mafia
but sulit gave reasons for their galena read today
I voted them for this post
I replied this post
With my vote
The posts afterwards strengthened my scumread
i don’t give a fuck
i’m trying to find out why she suspected galena in the first place and there is no conceivable reason
look at her eod yourself if you don’t believe me
her reasons only came after she voted galena
ok then, correction:
your reasons for suspecting galena were from posts they made after you already began suspecting them
Yes that’s how “bad reactions to pressure” work Arctic
You know
The person has to be pressured first
Here’s what happened
You said galena was wolfy
You then only used posts they created after you already said they were wolfy
see the problem here? you had no evidence to think they were scum before your read
Yes
Because it’s
How they reacted to my saying they’re wolfy bubba
so then why did you say they were wolfy before they made that reaction
An additional note on this. I was going through some posts from D1 while looking into Wazza, and I got to the point where there was a big argument between Alice and Marshal. Alice was accusing Marshal of rolefishing. Now, it seems like Alice might have been overreacting a bit, and I probably would normally dismiss this. But coupled with the stuff about my night action reveal, I do wonder if Alice picked up on something valid there.
Because the post
Reacting to my graph was overblown and pinged me as scummy judging I didn’t have a lot of influence in thread and hadn’t voted them yet
(which I replied to)
(With my vote)
But your graph was you saying you wanted to vote them
Why
You know what my graph also said
“Despite having no explanation”
that is my point
you had no reason for suspecting them until after you pushed them bc ur read was fake
it was gut
we went through this
I wouldn’t have actually voted them if they hadn’t said the things I quoted in my post