I don’t much like. The special classes shouldn’t be killing classes
cult leader is an exception. This classes main ability is killing, while the cult leader’s is converting
King’s ability to decide fate is a ‘killing special class’, though. (Only difference is his ability can’t be recharged with executions, of course.) Also keep in mind if no one visits you, you’re not killing anyone. XD
by that logic, psychic is killing class, as they can place players on trial.
King is more social than anything. Vote/trial manipulation is social, not killing.
1 Like
Remember this is by your logic.
So by your logic Alchemist is a Neutral Killer then? Cause she too can kill at night.
2 of the four abilities are related the killing. The other 2 are royal blood and a 1 use ability
You: Queen can kill.
Me: So can King.
You: By that logic…
Me: Your logic.
You: No.
Okay.
It’s also really silly to say the Queen has two abilities “related” to killing, when one is just a passive that replenishes usage.
I still think Queen should be a Special Class.
But I don’t think she should become King.
I mean who would want to throw a sufficently more powerful class for a weaker one?
Also, the Queen should have some power over the votes.
An anonymous vote perhaps?
the queen has two main abilities.
one is one use, the other is killing.
I wonder, what should the class be?
by your logic, reaper should be social because he can silence players.
Well, you have the abilities mixed up and are basing that statement on completely flipped information, so I’ll back off and let you reshuffle that and come back with a different reason.
Ah, know I see velvet glove.
Knight can guard (support) and coldsteel (killing) and is killing.
A killing ability is more likely to determine a class type then.
So what of my point that King can decide fate and auto-kill someone? Isn’t that a killing ability?
Its not a kill. Its an execute. There is a difference and it is enough to make it a social ability