Lawful? Neutral? Chaotic?
You say good.
But “lawful” might be considered good.
And yet we can still have lawful evil
Lawful? Neutral? Chaotic?
You say good.
But “lawful” might be considered good.
And yet we can still have lawful evil
wipes sweat
I think lawful
in terms of D&D alignments, lawful is somebody who adheres to a set of rules strictly while chaotic is someone who constantly writes their own rules and ignores everyone elses
hence why gorta’s plan doesn’t work
an evil player might have a more civilized wincon, a good player might have a more… dangerous wincon
…
I would like to consider Gorta as an execution.
Now let’s say, hypothetically, that the candidates gave their reasons for election
Who, then, would be the best to elect?
None of the above.
Let chaos reign
a LE would probably still want to fuck you over but they’d be a lot tamer about it than
just about any chaotic alignment on the spectrum
We live in a free market society.
You can as long as those post-modern neo-joycatters don’t try to take away your freedoms in the name of progress
wut
also when we have shit like Lawful Neut vs Chaotic Neut where we don’t really know what they want to do
how do you think
neo-joycatters
i
stop
no
you won’t make me laugh
i cannot laugh at this
I think Gorta’s like already slipping up and yet this isn’t even a town v mafia game. This is impressive levels of what the fuck
So like, do we as a consensus want to open the gates of glory, or?
Yes
also this worked really fucking well one time so lets go
I am true neutral, everyone mass claim to me