Anyway you were saying something Wazza? Lets talk about more happy topics.
Okay so I have a question for you.
You clearly have a lot of posts in the chat and it’s clear you have a main wolfread in Ash and I of course, read the context of the reasoning. Based on what I see in the posts leading up to this, I more or less believe what Ash did was Town, you’re entitled to your own reasoning, yes but I want to know how you came to the conclusion that it makes Ash scum? Based on what I see here, Ash voted you to get you to explain your townread and that’s what you did, but then your post later on uses that as a reason against Ash without including the other parts.
So my question is, why didn’t you quote everything involved in your reasoning for scumreading Ash?
I don’t like Ash’s progression for suddenly scum reading me. He was town reading me and then suddenly decides I’m scum and votes me up. Does that sound like something a townie would do?
That’s why I’m scum reading him.
I’ll read up more of Ash’s ISO which is harder than it should be as I wasn’t happy and all I’ll say is that my mind would rather do something else than obsess over Ash right now.
I think you completely misinterpreted what was going on. Ash didn’t state he scumreaded you at the time where you began scumreading him, what he stated was he didn’t like how you suddenly got to ‘This can’t come from a wolf’ and he wanted an explanation for that so he placed pressure on you, in which you reacted horribly, from my perspective.
Not to mention, you did not answer my question just then. Why did you leave certain things out of the reasoning you scumread him?
Centuries, Me and TWL should be Town Core.
Whatever then.
@ChopChop, Towncore is reserved for players who physically can not be scum no matter how we look at it. I don’t see that in any of you. While you can be a townread, Towncore is too far.
We mechanically Confirm each other
1 Like
Don’t be surprised if you have to wait for an answer to your question.
If you’re wondering why I ignored his other posts, no I didn’t. I used the relevant posts to show that his progression on me is bad. If you don’t see it that way, then I can’t help you there.
Hey Seth. Good to see you’re here.
I see you claimed to have information. Okay then.
Hm, I believe I might have missed that part.
I only exactly skimmed through the thread and stopped at points I saw interesting, like Richards opinion on Ash.
I’ve read it. You can send anonymous messages which are either information or is a deal.
You’re able to send messages at night.
I never said you ignored his posts, actually I saw you respond to them, what I was asking in your ‘What is this progression explanation’ thing, you didn’t quote the posts where he talks about ‘If you can explain the vote, it’s fine.’.
You know this doesn’t make you scum, it just means you left out evidence that can make a person look better.