https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1-gYWDk7SMsWcN1jw6RP8yzt5EQesLIkltGS_AvrjoW0/edit#responses
Repost for anyone who didn’t see this
pls fill this out if you joined the game
you may also fill it out if you spectated the game
Are you going to post the results?
I can if wanted
It’d be interesting to see
also, whoever suggested on the poll that we merge occupation and prevention
We already have, and it doesn’t work. Mass claiming still enables gamesolving.
Its easy. just add the sniper that shoots anyone who claims
I feel like Investigation classes should know they were redirected/occupied/prevented
I see you have the hearthstone design team’s mindset
“If something is broken, make something situational and otherwise terrible that can potentially fix it!”
Wait. Would it be bad to give scum a sort of day vig
They do know if they’re prevented or occupied.
They recieve the “You were unable to check _____”. message if they are
I don’t think i ever had to send out this message that game though since every investigation succeeded.
Should investigators know if their target was changed? (But not to whom, obviously.)
- They do know
- They do not know
0 voters
I mean I would say not.
If a invoker redirects a paladin who’s about to check them into another person. The paladin will think he’s BD.
But Paladin should know they were interfered with
Also, Pally is killer class and would not count towards this
I mean good point with killer class.
well his check would
it’s an investigative ability that has inherent feedback
But yeah, I think ‘Maid’ Vs Drunk should be scum Vs town obviously, not ‘Town’ Vs town as it was this game. IMO.
But if a drunk redirected a maid.
The maid would get incomp because royal blood
But they should know they were redirected which is my point.