i think i need another perspective on both you and jane because everything about what i’m doing right now feels wrong, so if you would care to oblige
…that was really rude, sorry.
hi
you mean about the way you approached Jane with asking them to analyse a macro-read?
no my conclusions from it, i have no regrets on my methods. underhanded, sure, but they seem to have baited something out. could you read my posts about Jane potentially TMI’ing themselves w and explain to me why i’m wrong because i can’t see it yet i feel i ought to be wrong here
Well, not exactly right
I think Jane is wolf caught for the wrong reasons, really
The fact they’ve hesitated to make a read on Emilia yet have a method to do so is weird
Hesitating to make a read on ppl is what I usually do as wolf to analyse gamestate and other people’s reads first to decide who to push later based on Town’s consensus for an easy ML
okay but they assumed emilia was a villager, using an example from this game as an example of their village play, after expressing their read on Jane as a villagelean
wait
their read on Emilia
you see what i mean
Did they use any other examples from any other games?
Warning: the only host online may fall asleep randomly due to…well…it being 5 AM. In the event that happens there will be no host online to process things. Another should come online in 4 hours at the latest.
here’s The Post that i’m talking about for reference
Goodnight Geyde
there’s no direct reference to the quote in the actual post but it implies, based on context, that this is teh evidence for the first point in the post. unless i’m heavily misreading this and jane is saying the post can be read as both oh shit yeah okay i get it now
okay so it’s not an ironclad TMI out but it’s still pretty weird and TMI-y to describe their perspective as v in the same terms as you described their play earlier and then called NAI.
still wolfy but not outed
Yeah I’m having trouble seeing that
It just seems like they’re stating their previous meta and then showing how a post in this game fits into that?
‘their’ being Emilia
for context, Luxy, here’s an earleir jane post in the same conversation:
To me, it seems like they’re trying to evaluate people based on whether or not they waste their posts. And also trying to gauge whether or not people’s thoughts are genuine or faked (like in #1952).
those are very very simmilar phrasings so you can understand why i assumed this was them TMIing Emilia v. i think it’s a weird way of going about things and jane is wolfy.
i feel a lot better now. knew there was something i was getting wrong.
Agreed it does feel awkward
missed event because sleep