So is this going to be another time where my single vote killed livicus?
/vote Unknown
Not this time. Every time he is in a game, he is inactive somehow and he can be a massive liability, as well as another player that used to play called Sketch. This time, we are not going to ignore him. We are gonna pressure him till we can get some sort of response from him whether it will be town motivated, scum motivated, or some sort of slip
He’s inactive as heck, that’s true. However, activity is NAI. So, I think we have to be careful with pushing someone due to their past. Instead, we need to push actively scummy players. Only annoying thing is so many posts have happened.
It’d be great if someone could make occasional summary posts, as then people can check up quicker and formulate better ideas
1 Like
Just reread the list and realised that he was not in it. Someone mentioned them so it confused me
I’m behind this. Being a 34-player game means we’ll get far too much spam and shitposting.
3 Likes
game seems way more quiet than I expected tho. On grandish idea there were moments with like 10 people typing at the same time.
Eyes Fire, Meme and a few others
How about an inverse post restriction.
You guys have a post limit.
Post too much and I ITA you. Hard.
The reason I’m advocating against a lurker lynch d1 is because we can get rid of lurkers with ITAs starting d2
4 Likes
We can vote them now though? So why the defense now then rather than getting rid of soeone like this right away?
What do you mean by that? My priority would be to find someone who is acting scummy.
However, as a policy lynch, why would we avoid voting an inactive?
Nolynch is the worst thing people can do
1 Like
It’s usually ineffective to analyze shitposts, so if we are going to PL someone we may as well do it d1.
Nolynch is especially bad here since its plurality lynch so someone could snipe lynch a player near the end if we dont vote anyone.
1 Like
