Whoever has most votes will be lynched anyway
I never said ‘no lynch’
I said ‘not a lurker lynch’
what happened
no lynch is impossible in plurality anyway
Since this is a 34-player game I’d assume the scum faction has around 6~9 players, so I’d suggest we avoid keeping the lynch numbers low as it’d be too easy for them to CFD towards random players at the day’s end.
Exactly. Unknown barely posts useful content and has been a liability for a long time. This is why he is my d1 pl. People are claiming that HTM is a good person when in fact, Unknown would be a better pl right now.
Change my mind
We aren’t voting htm to lynch tho we are voting for pressure.
Anyway this might be a flawed point of view because PLs are thing so I’ll just rest my case here
We can’t exactly pressure someone who isn’t on right now.
If all scum CFD at the end of the day then we just caught all scum though
Ehhh, I think it might be better to add pressure on someone that would be a pl lynch d1 rather than just reaction testing/pressure voting
/Vote Unknown
I’m doing this for now, since with 2 votes on a target, it is harder for scum to pull off a CFD later on into the day.
If as the day progresses, we find a better target, I can easily move my vote.
However, for now, I am using it to stop a mislynch that scum may try to guide us to later today
People are sheep and this can be easily disguised through bad-faith scumhunting.
I’m sorry lads, The Joker has my <3
What i am actually wondering here is if town and scum married each other then what happens ?
/vote Pug
“don’t vote a inactive”
Votes a person who isn’t even on.
Glad to hear it.
Nobody else would want it.
So thanks Joker for taking the hit
Pug never posted btw
idk neutral child?
My child hasn’t any faction tho