[FM] 2d3 II - Title Game - Mafia Concedes

geyde lets get ici. if they are town get simon simple

1 Like

/vote ici

1 Like

theres only 2 mafia and there isnā€™t any framers

I really donā€™t want to believe it, but the logic works out.

2 Likes

/vote Ici

1 Like

Itā€™s the only point where you actually interact with a player is soft-defending the scummiest player in the thread at that time. He flipped maf as well.

It wasnā€™t really logical.
You hardly explained the part you voted them for, in stark contrast to your initial debasing of their argument. The part that pings me there is that you put so much effort into the defense, instead of the offense which would reasonably require explaining.

You developed no reads beyond the crappy one against Isaac / Hja

If you have a problem of lurking, just try creating discussion. It doesnā€™t have to be good discussion, but any chance to create player reactions makes endgaming more difficult for scum.

Whyā€™d you ask me for reads then

Itā€™s literally pointless

And yes Iā€™m aggroing on the cop claim

we already solved the game geyde

Like either Simon is sitting writing this with the most shitfaced grin or heā€™s lying about being cop.

we are only voting ici because simon is a cop claim

I have fury

1 Like

I spent 5 minutes writing up the case against Simon fully expecting it to go through

Also Magnus was committing the cardinal sin of whiteknighting suspicious players in the early game.

Donā€™t do that

This read still makes complete sense CMV

Who wants to play checkers

Iā€™m bored :stuck_out_tongue:

i wasnt trying to say he was town. like at all. i was saying the part where he was interacting as if he were in a different game should be disregarded. not counted toward his credit, or against him.

I thought it was pretty logical :frowning:. And i thought the reason it was scummy was obvious, that there was no way a townie would know for sure (the way he said it implied it wasnt just reads imo) that one person is town and another is scum. In particular since there isnt N0 checks.

well duh. i said i was doing it while developing reads. as in, i didnt have much at the time, and the one/s i did have werenā€™t fully formed.

Thats what i was trying to do? I guess i can try other things. my bad.

i was effectively making small talk. I could see you were typing a lot and it was just pausing a lot so i thought maybe the forum was glitching or something so i thought id ask something easy to respond to just to make sure, and thats what i came up with.


Regardless, none of the above matters. Although Iā€™d heavily prefer you hang ici, im completely fine with you hanging me. as long as its one of us two. because then tomorrow you can hang ici, because you know for absolute sure exactly one of me and ici is scum, since there is only 1 maf and no framers. Anyone saying lynching someone who isnt me or ici is at all useful right now is straight up wrong

what does CMV stand for?

Change my view

1 Like

This would be easy to believe if it had not completely conflicted with the first point you brought up in your defense. Itā€™s completely unrelated and had you said it earlier I would not see it as backpedaling.

There was a disparity in the read, which was the point I was making. The defense of yourself took priority over the initiative to find scum as seen by the lengths of the different sections of the post. That could easily be construed as super scummy.

The point still stands. You were on thread for a while and didnā€™t even try to make a read. If you donā€™t have a point you can get people to talk in order to make one.

You really didnā€™t.
Basically content post. Questions at a basic level further town agenda.

Uhā€¦okay?

The point of it all is that had you not been cop with a redcheck I would have tried to lynch you. And probably succeeded.