Tank 2 and 3 - I also kinda want to follow up the “Friends” strategy, cause if we really do have a traitor here, that means they can win with us and there is not much problem about it.
We should use threat instead of enemy so it’s more specific to our card
Yeah, it was general shape of what direction I can see it going next.
Also this does mean that if there is traitor, he is not a threat to us, so hopefully we are not a threat to them either.
It would be a waste but we could in theory ask if theirs a traitor
“Everyone who visits balance panel member or shoots them in ITAs is publicly announced as “Poisoned” at the end of the phase”
Prove me wrong.
What would that do
At first rule change - give us information about who visited us.
At second rule change - whatever we chose it to do.
Hm
I have to go back to work now tho
Also, was you tank 2 or 3?
Can’t tell.
Tank two, three is lazy
thread being dead works okay for us I guess, especially with mist being able to douse
Didn’t we already tell you this is hydra?
Wasn’t it obvious?
Usually hydras are two
But I suppose if you make the rules you’re allowed to bypass them… or something.
If they couldn’t win with us alive
We couldn’t win with them alive
What is the question here
*because the game wouldn’t end if two factions who couldn’t live with each other were still alive
Not really?
If they are not a threat to us, it doesn’t mean we are not a threat to them.