Not confirmed yet
or I just have an ability that increases my ITA chance because its the only way I can kill
I’m hypothesising here but being very careful just in case something similar happens to me. Cause I actually know what Simon is talking about and if it works similarly here then I might have to be careful.
im afraid im going to have to ask you to do exactly that if you wish me to vote derps.
means nothing evidence/argument-wise
threats to directly hurt the town? im not making you scum over this, ive done the same as a neutral before, but ima need more info and promises on your side if you expect me to go along with this.
uni confirmed in literally one of the most reliable ways possible in a bastard game such as this
one of his early posts was to ITA uni so ive no idea what your on about
and this makes me put a lot less stock in your words.
you personally need him dead? then you’ll have to work hard to convince me why town needs to lynch him and thats not just you trying to convince us to do so when he’s not as harmful.
Noting the specific usage of the word target, with the thing at daystart with nerbins
and yet you have a target? hmmm
note that o
this isnt evidence.
owo whats this?
in all seriousness, enemies against the scp are not necessarily enemies against the town. or rather society i guess. thats what i mean in above when i said town.
we have reason to believe there is a second scum faction. also thats not what he said. he said that scps and geydebots are roles in this game. nothing about their relative alignments.
so you ARE a member of 3p?
we dont know whether their against or for us. youve been the latter. derps has assumed the former due to his role, i believe, but has not specifically claimed that. regardless, weve seen no solid evidence by this point to support either side. so stop assuming its public knowledge.
are you saying you know his wincon now? just because he wants to hunt scps doesnt mean we cant win with him.
are you in the 3p chat?
or rather, are you in a 3p chat?
assuming scps are society again.
if i were that i would claim it. or at least now i would. but im not, so im not.
im self-proclaimed anti-neuts-out, but that doesnt make me a neut.
again your word doesnt mean much when you’ve told us you have a target in them
because neutrals can have different wincons but still have similar leaning-alignments.
“if a this scorned-with-a-converted-target is supposedly aligned with us, then why do they not have the same wincon as this surv-neutral?” see? doesnt make sense
no? i mean it might. but all we’ve been told is that there is a non-town claimvig.
wait
uhhhhhhhh. remember when nerbins was talking about town being a separate faction from society?
interesting that you know this.
and so may be derps for all we know/
lmao that doesnt reveal you as society. it might to him, if we’re to believe the person who wants him dead really bad about his own abilities, buti dont think we should. again your word doesnt mean much. facts and objective statements work better than promises and guarantees.
- you literally claimed the 3rd party wincon
- we know of at least one scenario in which that doesnt actually imply anything. one that seems semi-reasonable.
Do I even need to say it at this point?
ima just make it an acronym: TFTYKYORIIE
see the above acronym
^this @KyoDaz^
presumably there is one thing/person i cant. but i can totally talk about people
apparently if you mention this thing then you get a penalty but dont die, and can still talk in thread.
what isnt lying?
again, wont confirm you.
Look at sulits dumb reasoning for sussing me.
If i was scum with him id have totes voted him here instead of saying i was waiting for more ppl and not voting sulit. Knowing sulit flips scum and not voting him makes me look scummy which i wouldnt have done.