this is some of the most blatant misrepresentation I have ever seen
like
I have been perfectly happy to answer non-pointless questions and have been doing so all game
I say that one question, the answer to which would have been obvious if the questioner had taken 10 seconds to read my Iso, is pointless, and Nappy is like ‘OH MY GOD ARETE CALLS ANYONE QUESTIONING THEM A WOLF’
lol
this is a new take and i suppose at the time, it indicates slight V, though Arete can fake this.
don’t know why they voted Jane - they should give a reason and I’m not reading it until they do.
Should also provide reasoning.
Like, none of their pushes have been overwhelming town @TheBlueElixir and their push on me was awful in a wolfy way.
I did (later)
I’ve explained my read on Dat/Wazza several times
like
‘I think Dat/Wazza is kind of scummy for this reason’
‘okay I’m voting Dat/Wazza’
just because they’re in different posts
doesn’t mean that I didn’t give a reason
if arete and nappy make it to lylo they should snapvote because yes
(obligatory /s)
First, question was not pointless.
Second, you literally accused the asker of being wolfy for doing so.
You know thought progression is how we solve games, and a player themselves naturally understands how their thought process works.
The fact that you called that question wolfy is literally so wolfy.
[quote=“Arete, post:331, topic:82543, full:true”]
That post is bad. ^^^
Can we just kill Arete today?
Ban Count
| Voted | Voters | Votes |
|---|---|---|
| Romeo and Juliet | Napoleon, TBE | 2/5 |
| DatBird/Wazza | Sulit/orange | 1/5 |
| Sulit/Orange | New World Order | 1/5 |
| Jane | Derps/Gorta, Wazza/Dat | 2/5 |
| The Scientists | Jane | 1/5 |
| Napoleon | Romeo and Juliet | 1/5 |
| TBE | Marshal/Kat | 1/5 |
Fun Link {won’t ruin your day probably}
Fun Link 2 {probably less interesting}
Fun Link 3 {I don’t give shit}
Fun Link for Sulit
why did kat take nappy’s picture and where do I find it
I did the <> thing under my vote btw
cool
anyway both Marshal v Jane and Nappy v Arete seem to be arguing about what people meant
which is dumb
I feel like some people misinterpreted this post.
“reading” as in providing a conclusion whether it’s scummy or towny.
Nappy/NWO/Derps&gorta should never include today’s execution, and I dont think Jane should either
(I think ive already provided reasons on all of these)
Fun fact
Since I started seriously pushing Nappy he has precisely one post (P#579) that contains a read that is not either a read on me or based on a preflip of me
this is wolfy both in the sense that an extremely narrow focus on the game is a pretty common wolftell for intermediateish wolves, and in the sense that focusing on one single person when you know you’re going down is a fairly common tactic to reduce spew
I was expecting this to be the post where you quote our points against us.
I’m now insanely disappointed that I can’t just point to Dat and be like: “his fault, he’s done it again”
