Oh I never noticed that
thats exactly what i was thinking. a frame-esque effect that targets the investigator, rather than the investigatee.
is there any evidence that shows this to be false?
read my originial post. that is what we are proving. we are proving astand is scum by seeing all ways he could be town. even if its unreasonable like āthere was an effect last night that caused all investigative abilities to yield false resultsā we are seeing every possible way astand could be town, and by showing them to be false, proving him as scum. this isnt reads based. your read on astand as to him doing scummy actions does not matter here in the slightest. this is my domain
look up proof by contradiction. its a legitimate thing
hm so
no matter what I say you guys will use it to condemn me
hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
I think that the poison is docbait even if it is not fake
anyway if you guys want I can claim flavor or role or simply a passive I have
heres what you should be doing.
trying to progress the game, even if it does end up condemning you. because once your dead we can then use that info better, assuming your town. you give us more associations to work off of, if your mafia you give us more spew (which you believe your town so you dont have to worry about but for us it helps in the possibility your mafia, which you can acknowledge exists for us, despite the fact that you know yourself to be town. so you should still do this, even if your town, or especially if your town) this all gives us more info which allows these people to make better reads.
for instance, you could help out with my proof im doing.
Simon, you can forget about that proof of yours, since it doesnāt take into account human factor. If I were actually scum and were making mindwarp defense, thereād be about 1% chance of anything existing that could possibly prove it wrong. I seriously recommend against doing those kind of proofs, especially in closed semi-bastard setups.
Iāll confess now, I never had any peeks at all in this game, I was fpsing.
I did think that FK was very wolfy in his play in general and even in the fact that he decided to start highposting all of a sudden right after his slot was getting a little pressure, and I didnāt like katzeās responses to my questions near the start of the day. I indeed started my peek as a reaction test, and the person I expected to get more indicative reactions from was katze, and I thought his tone after my fake peek was atrocious, so I made a decision to roll with my check. I did hope to get it right and possibly bait nightkill and anticlaim.
Maybe my read on FK was biased, and part of the reason, I admit, could be due to me just disliking him as a player in general. Iām probably not going to repeat this play in more serious games or when I have more free time to play.
As for today, Mercenary should be the lynch pretty much always.
Dat, I want a serious answer to this: Why are you implying that my first fake peek (on Maxi) is scum indicative for me? What would be my scum motivation for that peek and the following retraction of it?
Itās almost as if you feel the need to pile some additional ādammingā evidence against me and paint me worse than Iām already am.
Explain your thoughts in that regard more clearly for me.
I was at work at the end of the day, and even if I wasnāt, if I intended to retract my claim, I wouldāve done it before.
In retrospect, this entire post reeks of TMI that FK was town and grasping to find reason to whiteknight him. Looks like a common amateur scum mistake.
Because it locked a slot very early in the game as town, and allowed him to get away with shady shit
I thought he seemed off since Day 1. Then you retract it and no one has blinked an eye at his or your slot again. Its all off if you ask me.
Scum motivation, to lock a player who was your mate early as town so no one bothered them, or for the free towncred. When retracting it you did so, that way if the flip comes later you canāt be pinned for it, and be like guys its a reaction test.
Im just pointing out facts, thats two fake checks under your belt. One of which has gotten a town dead And other than that you havent impressed me much otherwise
So Iām guessing you think Astand is lying because of the FPS he did? If so, do you think heās a better lynch than Mercenary?
Oh, speaking of which, what do you think about her?
Actually to have a minimum chance of victory here the best for me is to openclaim tbh
I donāt think mafia is vigging this
I think eithers a fine lynch, Merc is prob the better lynch due to their posts with Luxy and how he systematically proved shes evil.
Really lacking in content, pushing agendas. Reminds me heavily of JOAT9 game recently