I think
Kind of yes, because in that situation it wouldnāt be suspicious for them to be agreeing on something. But there are a lot of ifs behind itā¦ Now that I think about it, that was maybe a stupid thing to say. I honestly donāt want to comment anything about those two until I re-evaluate my theory
Vote Count
| Accused | Voters | Number |
|---|---|---|
| Apprentice | sulit, Alice, Arete, Napoleon | 4/9 |
| Braixen | DryBones, Wiisp | 2/9 |
| Wiisp | SirDerpsAlot, Braixen | 2/9 |
| SirDerpsAlot | KyoDaz | 1/9 |
| Appelsiini | Marshal | 1/9 |
I think Wazzaās thought process here is V-indicative even though itās poorly worded.
I doubt Wazza would make this post if their read on Arete was fake. Besides, the ādefendingā was just one sarcastic post, so they wouldnāt have evidence to back it up if someone asked for it.
Not a very strong townread, but a townread nonetheless.
This aged poorly.
Either way, Iāve had a good sleep and now Iām ready to come out and say something.
We need to fucking lynch someone already, weāve got less than 12 hours to make a decision. Plurality EXISTS so we should be safe, but I donāt want wolves controlling the wagon.
1 Like
you arent even voting anyone, are you?
he feels kinda off
less agressive
Iām trying to pinpoint why I donāt like napoleon
but I feel like thereās an obvious different between poisonous/nightless and this game