what would you consider the chances of magnus flipping scum
I assume this is What was implied
1 Like
Not something alch claim will retract trying to heal Priestess (not saying he claimed alch)
@Magnus are you an Alch claiming Phys? I would rather not waste time on a Neut so please claim if you are one.
Okay, I just woke up, I’ve skimmed the thread, there’s a couple of posts I want to respond to in more depth but:
- Please stop openclaiming, we tried this in FoL 23 and it didn’t work, like, at all
- Cult/Unseen spawn chance is 50/50 per the OP (unlike in ToL), but base spawn rates don’t actually matter because there has been a paladin soft
3 Likes
So, angleshoot-y reasons aside, this basically clears me of being the person who bled Priestess, because bleeding someone immediately after they accuse you is incredibly dumb and I would never do that. (Obviously I could be lying about that, but Kape’s played enough ToL with me to hopefully be aware of that.) Obviously, in the theory where I’m Cult(seen), I’d have scumbuddies who could potentially panic-bleed Priestess, but I am at the very least confirmed as not the person who individually bled Priestess.
Regarding Possessed’s theory: I’m pretty sure there’s been an FoL recently where evils bled the King to frame them? I don’t remember the number but I’m pretty sure it was the one where Maxwell was the Warlock.
I mean, you aren’t wrong that I’m playing a little differently then I’ve played some of my previous games – I’ve been trying to take the feedback people have given me (don’t shine a spotlight on people’s softs, don’t randomly hardclaim day 2, that sort of thing) and incorporate it into my playstyle, and obviously that’s going to mean things like ‘no 300-word wallposts dissecting someone’s soft.’
BD for dummies:
- Don’t claim to be EK when you’re GK, in most circumstances (in some cases, doing it to bait out evils may be beneficial)
- Don’t get bled?? I guess?? Assuming you’re actually bleeding, I’m not sure what you’re supposed to do when, you know, someone bleeds you
I personally read Priestess as GK right now, for what it’s worth, but that’s partially based on the fact that Priestess is the person I’m trying to read, so not everything is as alignment-indicative as it might otherwise be.
2 Likes
I out at the start of the game.
I believe Magnus is scum, that’s why I’m voting them and I’m going to heal Priestess.
I would have no evidence if I didn’t out myself so, me outing has perfectly fine reasoning.
Tbh LAMIST is only really telling when in Lylo. But technically it could be seen as an act of whiteknighting.
Hm, Physician isn’t known for being a fun class but as a person who enjoys being ToL Chrono it’s not completely impossible that Magnus just has weird preferences.
Magnus has played FoL before, right? I feel like he’s experienced enough with FoL to know that blindly sheeping the King isn’t really how we do things here (especially given that trials aren’t a thing, but even without that).
Here we have a hardclaim from Magnus. I’m inclined to think that scum wouldn’t hardclaim so early, but that’s certainly an analysis that’s led me astray before, and in the context of the rest of his Iso it feels kind of like an attempt to suggest that by virtue of having hardclaimed, he’s confirmed.
I mean, I appreciate you not sheeping on me in as much as I know I’m BD, and my understanding of your reasoning (‘Kape is testing to see if I sheep Priestess, better prove him wrong’) at least sort of makes sense, but it is kind of weird how you were totally willing to sheep her before and then suddenly changed your mind.
This, and the fact that Magnus’s primary defense is repeating this, feels kind of scummy. Claiming doesn’t make you confirmed.
It’s kind of weird how he relies on ToL meta but doesn’t assume that ToL mechanics for things this simple would hold. It feels kind of like he’s searching for an excuse for two days from now, when Priestess turns up dead to bleed.