FoL Feedback Thread

Forum Matches Forum of Lies
#4901

scum doc wen

2 Likes
#4902

Maybe if scum could convert a healer

1 Like
#4903

yes

#4904

i plan on working that into mm passive

#4905

Herbalist?

1 Like
#4906

Prevention would count as protection too? Sage, Poacher, Soulcatcher, Herbalist and Enforcer can protect then. Some cult alts probably have things too.

#4907

Almost all of those evils can only protect other scum though

#4908

So why not open up that restriction too? Why should that need to be a restriction in the first place?

We donā€™t have the kiddie gloves for Knight CS or Prince execution, so evils should in fringe scenarioā€™s be able to protect non-evils as a bluffing mechanism or having neutral allies like alchemist siding with them.

1 Like
#4909

to prevent gamethrowing and healing a bleeding target :^)

#4910

also so visit prevention shouldnā€™t be abusable offensively

using it offensively is exclusive to sellsword / sage intentionally

#4911

We have forced replacements and a blacklist for proveable gamethrowing

1 Like
#4912

this is the real reason ā€˜:^)ā€™ implies non serious

1 Like
#4913

also serious answer about gossip: I donā€™t want it to confirm healers

Healers shouldnā€™t be hard confirmable ever

#4914

Actually this is not true. Out of those 5, 3 can protect non-scum. Herbalist should already be changed to being able to ā€œhealā€ non-scum, this is not even that clear in the classcard is it just death immunity?

#4915

ā€œProtectedā€ Doesnā€™t hard confirm healers like that then though if itā€™s defined as a basic unempowered assassin kill (not counting firewall) would not kill the target.

#4916

Actually why can Herbalist only target Unseen again?

#4917

we donā€™t balance games on game throwing

might as well make it so knights canā€™t cs till N3 and same for prince

1 Like
#4918

because imo herbalist is strong enough that it doesnā€™t also need to ability to confirm itself

#4919

read

#4920

literally liked it

read my likes