Because people are bad at balancing
Scorned does the same job but better because it requires work and promotes discussion
It wasnât about balancing it was about fun?
Either way there is nothing to support that you are better at balancing than someone else
Everybody can be an idiot, that doesnât take skill
I again point you to Foolâs winrate
If it took skill, it wouldnât win almost every single game itâs been in
Also why wouldnât you execute someone you suspect as fool. The punishment is a joke at this point when it helps bd more
So if paladin is derpcleared and you canât play scorned card
Either way why would we limit us to only 1 way of playing out of bad situation
If weâre getting into an ethical argument
I have a solid track record on balancing similar games and have been doing this for four years
Thatâs what we have meta for
When did I say that I am not against current state of fool
And whatâs its winrate
Why do we need a class that makes every other game worse for your one, single, oddball, unlikely-to-actually-occur hypothetical scenario?
And even in your case, itâs only debatably not making the game worse.
No offense Orange but Iâve cultivated my ability to be an idiot to the point where it very much requires skill, thank you very much.
2 Likes
Why does there have to be only 1 way out of that situation not allowing creativity to take place in play
To be fair, you have to have a very high IQ to understand the Fool. The humor is extremely subtle, and without a solid grasp of theoretical physics most of the jokes will go over a typical viewerâs head. Thereâs also the Fools nihilistic outlook, which is deftly woven into his characterisation - his personal philosophy draws heavily from Narodnaya Volya literature, for instance. The fans understand this stuff; they have the intellectual capacity to truly appreciate the depths of these jokes, to realize that theyâre not just funny- they say something deep about LIFE. As a consequence people who dislike Fools truly ARE idiots- of course they wouldnât appreciate, for instance, the humour in Foolâs existencial catchphrase âez gaem ez liefâ which itself is a cryptic reference to Turgenevâs Russian epic Fathers and Sons. Iâm smirking right now just imagining one of those addlepated simpletons scratching their heads in confusion as Dan Harmonâs genius unfolds itself on their television screens. What fools⌠how I pity them. 
And yes by the way, I DO have a Fool tattoo. And no, you cannot see it. Itâs for the ladiesâ eyes only- And even they have to demonstrate that theyâre within 5 IQ points of my own (preferably lower) beforehand.