Which was what?
This?
No. The topic was:
We have now a class with a swapping ability.
But we also have Knights (and now an BD Alch) who suicide when they shoot the wrong person
And thanks to swapping they can be very easily redirected without the intention to
In the actual game this was prevented by making the attack canceling itself, when redirected. But we donāt have this here, for some reasons(?), so we have a problem.
So you are saying, when person that want to attack that got redirected to attack someone else, the guilt stays?
Wasnāt there thing that wouldnāt happen for guilt to trigger if that is the case if it comes from non-bd class?
I may recall wrongly (and I didnāt saw edit)
Smart play should be rewarded
Bad play should be punished
Those are the reasons
Right now it is:
You are Knight. You shoot A (who actually is Assassin)
A and B (a Prince) gets swapped
You and the Prince die.
On the other hand yeah this is kinda meh
But the solution is not to stop the attack, itās either stopping guilt or not having it be so impactful in the first place
Itās the same with Drunk and Debauch in general, but with swapping itās even worse
actually, what are the reasons for your opinion?Kinda different, any person that want to visit A happens to be visiting B and vice versa for people visiting B will ve visiting A
I just gave them
Why would we handhold when we can instead make a game where your actions and skill directly determine outcomes with no inflated positives just because
1 Like
Knight: makes a good decision, they shoot an Assassin
CW: makes a good decision, they protect the prince by swapping them with the Assassin (the assassin will not shoot himself normally)
I would argue both made a bad decision in failing to pay attention to the other
Itās a social game
1 Like