priestess
you are over thinking this
You can understand it this way
NAR is: each player has a subjective truth which is only true for his individual perspective
ToL is: one objective truth
Nar is easy for the host but it gives contradicting results
Can you cite one example to support your point
Im confused where the source of your confusion is
That there’s a difference between NAR and ToL’s interpretation of NAR
with full feedback yes
with limited feedback no
Nar is resolving results.
Tol uses an algorithm resolving actions.
It has completely different results
Because nar is result-consistent
While tol is action-consistent
This
Applying the Golden Rule in Three Easy Steps
- Find an action (or a passive modifier, such as Bulletproof) such that its effect cannot possibly be modified by any other action.
- Resolve it.
- Repeat from step 1 until all actions are resolved.
I dont understand your point
What is with this wikia text about nar
And why does it have to do anything with tol at all?
This direct citation from the article shows that it handles multiple results for same person
I dont understand your point
What is with this wikia text about nar
And why does it have to do anything with tol at all?
Because ToL uses NAR
I explained with the SS + Occupier example
Is there anywhere the algorithm for the bot
I could understand that one better
There’s no bot
It’s an article
Cause for me the golden rule and
Do not use this list unless actions are actually in conflict; that is, that both affect each other.
Makes no sense.
Why not just using the list for everything
I need an algorithm to understand it
And this article is really bad in that