And I haven’t lied to BD that we can afford to lynch Marshal as alternative, so yeah @Marshal you told me to convince them in one post, then I subtly did that.
I’ll make this clear if it hasn’t been already
Strigoi really wants to have close games in order to meet its wincon.
Neuts as a balancing tool is inherently fallacious, because they can’t be.
Neutrals have mechanical ability to completely side with a given side and not give a fuck about the other a large majority of the time.
SS/WL are lost wolves in everything but name.
4 Likes
It’s fun?
Given the nature of neutral rolling, adding more just increases variety and doesn’t change balance as long as the macro is preserved
Plus
It’s only going to be for testing until we see if we actually want or longer term
What’s wrong with stirgois design just saying u dont like it doesnt help us make it better
I’m not sure I understand what that means
Define unbased
Define cringe as it relates to your point