If you are ready to help, be welcome!
But please not just with the usual “remove NK, remove neuts, remove Prince” stuff we know from you
Anyways helping and suggesting changes you disagree with are not mutually exclusive
1 Like
i only dislike neutrals when they’re bad neutrals. i do admittedly have an immense dislike for Prince, but honestly the class is in a pretty good place right now?
1 Like
like serial killers are a great design element. they’re unique, their playstyle is unique, etc. removing neuts from FoL entirely would be absolutely disastrous, as 90% of the sources of information in the game presume their existence
but removing a specific design element from the setup because it’s been causing problems for use? that’s not something that should be rejected out of hand just because it’s a bit radical
That sounds a lot better.
Okay… what would you say to the problems we have rn, aka “fol is way too townsided, NK has no winchance”? I listed a few suggestions which came up in this thread, what is your opinion to them?
(and yea Solic made a pretty good version of the Strigoi a bit later)
there’s not really much you could do to remove neuts from the game in any real capacity without actually destroying the core of the setup. but removing one specific wincon group? totally viable.
My solution to NK having no winchance but creating massive amounts of swing is to remove it, and my solution for FoL being too v-sided is to add more neutrals in the wake of the death of the NK to counterbalance that fact.
that doesn’t sound like enough though tbh, so we’d have to try some attempts to buff the wolves in addition to removing NK in this hypothetical EFoL
Removing it seems to solve that
Cutting back down on players helps with BD-sidedness
He’s literally answering those exact questions
2 Likes
FoL was scumsided at 16p before
I wouldn’t discount the effect of going back on the changes for 18p
And that change was made to increase game length
Which removing NK also solves