it’s a pity that it’s not this big spooky thing that doesn’t obey the laws of nature but in fact just a complex FM setup with weird rules, isn’t it
FoL is unique in its concept.
Ignoring that and just saying “yea I dont like SKs, we should delete them in FoL too” is just selfish
FoL is a subcatagory of FM and is based on ToL which is a RTSDG.
Also Icibalus plays FoL.
lul if y’all remove NK
it’s not even FoL anymote
its just a FM with FoL flavor and conversion
3 Likes
very occasionally, but i still play it. i also was pretty influential in many of the decisions we had to take in order to balance FoL (removing trials, rebalancing Fool, etc.) for the forums
1 Like
I would not propose removing NKs if I didn’t think it was absolutely neccecary to do so.
But we’ve reached a point where it is impossible for us to move forward with advancing the setup with the huge swing that NK adds.
What is this even. You never play FoL. You have no interest in this game but in pushing agenda, like I did. You are like me - just the opposite direction.
Come, let’s be constructive instead. Let’s help these people to organize themselves. Let’s listen to them and help them with their ideas.
that doesn’t prove me wrong in the slightest, since it’s based on the ludicrous notion that FoL isn’t still FM.
3 Likes
I’d not consider you as fol host tbh, I’ve not seen you play in the last… uh… years?, do you even still know the rules?
A lot of people are in the fol team
Even people who aren’t here anymore and will never come back
2 Likes
i have been busy lately, and FoL has never been my favourite setup, but i want it to make it work. only reason I haven’t played it lately is because sixth form is swamping me