FoL Feedback Thread

Forum Matches Forum of Lies
#9535

I’m saying both cancel out as that’s in accordance with what Solic has stated.

Foolproofing.

#9536

(It’s FoL 22.)

Also, under what circumstances will a Knight CSing a BD who doesn’t die to the CS cause the Knight to suicide? In ToL they’ll suicide if the BD was healed/delayed, but not if the BD was DI (or merc shielded, but that doesn’t matter here), but I know I can’t trust things to work the same way.

1 Like
#9537

But then there’s no point in changing this interaction other than exactly giving knight the opportunity to kill NKs.

#9538

Bypassing deathimmunity is not only because of NKs

#9539

Also interacts with Puppet Strings, if the Possessor forces a DI target to attack a target guarded by a Knight.

1 Like
#9540

How about ‘if the target is BD’ since the death immunity interaction is unintuitive?
Then you could make it cancel on redirection.

#9541

I know this is a controversial take but I like how FoL CS doesn’t cancel on redirection

2 Likes
#9542

Where?

#9543

Ask Solic
That’s how he handles the interaction.

#9544

I know how Solic handles that. But that’s nothing I can tell my newbie hosts. “Ask Solic” is a bad explanation for anything ^^

1 Like
#9545

But it is changing the balance.

#9546

Oh no what will we do without fol mods :scream_cat:

#9547

It’s not changing the balance.
That’s how the interaction works, apparently

#9548

Or fol balance team

same difference

#9549

That’s why I’m adding it to the card. The interaction is confusing.

#9550

If knight doesn’t bypass immunity does he still protect the target if a nk attacks their target

#9551

Yep

#9552

Then link this,

https://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?title=Reasonable_Action_Resolution

1 Like
#9553

In tol if a reaper bypasses immunity using the 2 Soul he bypasses the knight passive

How about here

#9554

With a wording change, yes.
Currently, technically no.