FoL Feedback Thread

Forum Matches Forum of Lies
#10516

I’m Guide since January

#10517

Oh

I generally assumed those are the same join date I guess

#10518

Ah

I know why

ToS does that

#10519

Possible minor NK buff: give the occ/red immune NKs the same addendum (‘You will know if someone tries to occupy you or change your target’) that the Mastermind has, allowing them to more easily fake investigative classes if they so wish.

7 Likes
#10520

And its a decent convert because you basically get to pick ur unseen class from all dead flips

1 Like
#10521

ah yes, let the game become a match of mechanics

count me out

#10522

Swing makes the game luck-based (in which classes rolled) instead of skill-based.
Therefore it bad.

#10523

When I was a child I was all for chance and crap but now I’m so fixated on consistency I frown at d&d because it uses a d20.

#10524

There’s a lot of things you think of bad or good as a child and when you grow up you realize how naive you were

3 Likes
#10525

allow me to randomly rant at barb?

#10526

oof, but we are playing a game, why is random generally bad :stuck_out_tongue:
But nah, using mechanics isn’t “random”

#10527

Mechanics leads to Swing leads to Random leads to No fun
:thinking: That’s an interesting… approach for trying to balance a heavily mechanic focused game.

#10528

Ye let’s make fol all any

#10529

honestly barbarian is at the same time the best and worst class on design
it is good because unlike the minmaxers I believe honestly that MADness is good. The barb fits well a roll-for-stats game (if you roll three good atributes, get a barb) and a point buy one. Yes, a point buy one even if it is MAD. Because either you go 15/15/15/8/8/8 and have abismal mental stats, or you will become a tank (low str, high dex and con), or you will become a glass canon (low con, high dex and str) or you will become a roadhog aka meatshield (low dex, high con and str).
But it uses
So many d12s.
d12s not only for the optimal barb weapon (two-handed axe) but also for the hp of the class.

#10530

Yep… is that a reason to delete barbarian? Hardly :smiley:

#10531

…Can I explain it in dice roll percentages? It is the only way I can.

1 Like
#10532

I’m playing Pathfinder, so yeah, I understand D&D talk.

#10533

(Btw, if you want less randomness, make healer+sheriff/paladin guaranteed again)

#10534

My approach for BD spawns would be btw:
First roll for the type of the class
BD killer
BD support
BD social
BD offensive
BD investigative
to 1/5 each.
Then you roll for the class inside of that type.
So that adding a new BD killer doesn’t change the complete balancing towards “more bd killers”
But that’s just an idea.

8 Likes
#10535

How many bd spots are there again?