FoL Feedback Thread

Forum Matches Forum of Lies
#12899

i disagree

make neut claims as viable as they are in ToL

chances they wont interlap and chances that the neuts won’t claim.

#12900

2-3 neuts is how things should be

#12901

I agree, I will find it unacceptable to start with 3 starting minority informed group and have second convert off the bat.

1 Like
#12902

Seriously they are too random

#12903

No more neuts

#12904

Isn’t that the fun part? More random means less mechanical confirmations and more read based games.

2 Likes
#12905

Do we have NK spawning in the game? We never know ~

#12906

2 potential NKs :smiling_imp:

#12907
  1. Not necessaraly
  2. It means more unbalanced
#12908

remove all neuts And make NK masons

#12909

To be fair, FoL is not meant to be 50/50 spawn balanced. It’s always a bit swingy
Depends on neutrals, depends on the BD spawns, depends on King, depends on … so much different stuff

#12910

Yes We already have balance issues Thats Why We shouldnt add more unbalanced things

#12911

I’m proposing the idea of one of the slots POTENTIALLY rolling neutral, so it’s not inherently unbalanced. 3 neutrals can potentially whack the balance, but its the potential that changes it. Scum gets claim advantage but not necessarily neutral numbers advantage.

I think it’s a lot better than an extra convert slot, and it’s literally the only way most NKs can stand a chance. What’s the NK winrate here?

#12912

If you’re talking about regular FoL, the NK winrate here is ‘technically back when Revenant was a thing someone won with it’

1 Like
#12913

+2 bd means NK isn’t gonna win like ever

#12914

NK masons

1 Like
#12915

NKs need a pick me up :frowning:

1 Like
#12916

NK already has trouble fighting through that fact that like 1/3 of BD classes can be confirmed not NK

1 Like
#12917

adding 2 BD slots isn’t the way for that to happen

#12918

Yes that makes a big balance difference between games Where there are 3 scumsided neutrals And 1 more neutral neutral