FoL Feedback Thread

priestess
you are over thinking this

You can understand it this way

NAR is: each player has a subjective truth which is only true for his individual perspective
ToL is: one objective truth

Nar is easy for the host but it gives contradicting results

Natural action resolution is a system of resolving night actions adopted for use in Normal games.”

Can you cite one example to support your point

Im confused where the source of your confusion is

That there’s a difference between NAR and ToL’s interpretation of NAR

1 Like

with full feedback yes
with limited feedback no

Nar is resolving results.
Tol uses an algorithm resolving actions.

It has completely different results
Because nar is result-consistent
While tol is action-consistent

This

Applying the Golden Rule in Three Easy Steps

  1. Find an action (or a passive modifier, such as Bulletproof) such that its effect cannot possibly be modified by any other action.
  2. Resolve it.
  3. Repeat from step 1 until all actions are resolved.

I dont understand your point
What is with this wikia text about nar
And why does it have to do anything with tol at all?

This direct citation from the article shows that it handles multiple results for same person

Because ToL uses NAR
I explained with the SS + Occupier example

1 Like

Is there anywhere the algorithm for the bot
I could understand that one better

There’s no bot
It’s an article

1 Like

https://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?title=Natural_Action_Resolution

Cause for me the golden rule and

Do not use this list unless actions are actually in conflict; that is, that both affect each other.

Makes no sense.
Why not just using the list for everything

I need an algorithm to understand it
And this article is really bad in that