FoL Feedback Thread

Forum Matches Forum of Lies
#14920

I am once again suggesting limited strongman or limited unassigned kills

#14921

Give NKs at least some buffs that should have already come along with increasing playercount.

#14922

And if you have the Cultseen eliminating NKs more often, you ergo lead to Cultseen eliminating their own KP more often.

#14923

How about a buff that gives them a loss rate of 0%?

#14924

add revenant

done

#14925

how about we donā€™t do that

#14926

Sure
Iā€™ll buff them to the point where their not winrate is 100% and their loss rate is 0%

1 Like
#14927

you want 0% lossrate you reap the consequences

#14928

Yea, itā€™s almost as if changing one thing affects the whole system of classesā€¦

#14929

Yes, but the problem is that that makes it hard for us to increase Cultseenā€™s power, because that not only tanks NKā€™s winrate but undermines their own buff.

#14930

If itā€™s BD-sided (which remains to be seen imo), you buff scum, you donā€™t just buff one side of scum and call it a day, assuming the scum were in balance before.

#14931

Factional base ability
Once per game, a member of the scumfaction can perform the main killerā€™s killing ability instead of them, alongside their base action. They will still be seen visiting all targets they normally would, but will also visit the target of the kill.

1 Like
#14932

Buffing both sounds an awful idea based on the amount of swing it would add, and how much the game is dependent on the NKā€™s N1 kill.

#14933

instead means they canā€™t just double kill

#14934

ā€˜bypasses healing and granted immunityā€™

#14935

We could just not have quasi-multiball. We donā€™t really know if NK-less ToL/FoL is this horrifying thing because weā€™ve never tried it, which is why I suggest an EFoL with 16p, a nerfed BD, and no NK.

#14936
#14937

Try an SFoL
That has literally no resistance

#14938

yeah but I canā€™t just host an EFoL as an SFoL
that feels like cheating

#14939

Itā€™s not cheating
Itā€™s a completely valid tactic