i’ve actually erased my memory of that mechanic, thanks for giving me PTSD you asshole :^)
I’m going to stop typing on mobile and just visit this later. Meant interaction. People still want some of their impact on the game.
I still cant see how it can be cheating. You arent passing info on.
We arent ranked, so a mysterious “you are competing with other players to determine who is the best” is not given.
Ok you go play a game of fm for 3 weeks and lose because an amazing player from mafia universe or something was basically dictating my posts. How would feel?
It’s against the written rules
Which is like the definition of cheating
2 Likes
In ranked chess: you are playing to win
In unranked chess: you give your enemy tips or let a third party give him tips. You play to improve, not to compete
As much as priestess is entitled to her opinion there is no use arguing because
A) priestess no longer plays fm and therefore, she doesn’t have a stake
B) the rules will not be changed on the opinion of one player
C) anyone who breaks said rules because they disagree with them will be suspended
1 Like
We have to ban at least 6 current players then.
I’m not entitled to give any names, so don’t even try.
If you have a problem you may report players for rulebreaking in a dm to the forum moderators.
5 Likes
In this example the losing party is getting the tips, which is very noble
Can easily be other way around to make the skill gap even worse.
Let’s not have it be bystanders, but a compiled strategy team sitting in the room next door, while the player has a hidden ear piece. The internet is pretty anonymous after all. You see no problem with this, because it’s “just for fun” after all?
I’d feel pretty cheated if I discovered this.
1 Like
