No.
You do not need Mystic to change, I happens to play as Mystic did exactly to add one player not from imperial chat with someone else who belongs in imperial chat so they can share info each other.
That said person can still lie about the info, so there is balance of good and bad.
The Mind Flayer 
Isn’t that suppose to be 
on the ?
We can’t have converted Mind Flayers now do we? xD
2 Likes
@Emilia I would consider it 100% EFoL worthy if this game would contain 3 starting scum (ok on the other side it was tested in an EFoL/SFoL already), but adding 2 more BD should work out without completely changing everything
Cause BD will just use the 2 more people to mislynch another two BD
You know 
3 Likes
I’d personally see reasons why to add neutrals instead of only BDs, 1. to help the NK out, 2. to make the game a bit more interesting 3. to make fake claiming neutral as evil more viable 4. to maybe not change the balancing too much in direction of BD-sided
1 Like
To give scum the ability to take claim to the spot (lord knows they need extra claims) I’d make a motion to have it:
+1 Conf. BD slot
+1 BD or Neutral Non-Killer slot
1 Like
I’m of the opinion that more neuts the merrier.
How about 2 BD or Neutral Non-Killers? Brings total to 4 potential 
1 Like
i disagree
make neut claims as viable as they are in ToL
chances they wont interlap and chances that the neuts won’t claim.
I agree, I will find it unacceptable to start with 3 starting minority informed group and have second convert off the bat.
1 Like