Si
Noot claim = auto death
But
Dont lynch
Fool exists
Si
Noot claim = auto death
But
Dont lynch
Fool exists
Fool has a different wincon then get lynched=win
regardless, id say leave it to the Prince
why is chloe in chat did we do something wrong
hm
why is āfool existsā a reason to not execute claimed nontown
(/what do you think Foolās wincon in FoL is)
(but yes, I do think we should leave Merc for the Prince, it safely kills her but, unlike āneut claims bad printer go brrrrrā actually tells us anything)
Wait im confused
Crusader automatically gets the alignment of the first lynch
What if the first lynch is scoom
Tf is that claim
Isnt it the jester lmao
Lynching a Fool is still a dire consequence
Alice claimed a bounty on Merc
Merc claimed Crusader
Alice rescinded the claim
Fool doesnāt matter though, in ToL it would but this is FoL.
No one would claim Crusader, which is why Iām voting Mercenary, look at the class.
Katze is now claiming Noble and put bounty on Blizer, thereās no guarantee Mercenary is telling the truth
ā¦ Wahoo
I have clearly played ToL
/unvote
Exactly why Iām voting Mercenary.
Why would you claim Crusader before the first lynch no matter what you are?
This will reduce our information gathering a lot, it doesnāt affect groupscum much but weāre uninformed majority so thatās the problem
I smell a katze rt
My point exactly
Crusader appears to be a good noot claim tho since itās one of the few that are not blatantly anti-town
merc should always be the jail execute, not the lynch(because otherwise we get Prince not knowing who to exe/not exeing and we only get Vote Count Analysis if we dont lynch the openwolf)
this is on Blizer
do you think Blizer is a good lynch?
Iāve not exactly analyzed Blizer, only read some of his posts when I was reading the thread.