it is not considered gamethrowing if they believed that the actions they did would give they themselves (regardless of faction) a better chance to win
Unless you are no longer going to be of that faction
Erm… If they can kill Vampires as Town in TOS and choose not to allow themselves to be converted is Gamethrowing, even though they win
so if they believe that joining unseen gave them a better chance at winning than winning as bd, it is not gamethrowing to act accordingly
just because they can win as bd doesnt mean they have to
and TOS is a different game with different rules
Anyways, it’s actually in PKR’s best interests not to kill tonight
If he does kill me, we have a 33% chance of offing him tomorrow
If he doesn’t, it’s 25%
Either way it will be 50/50 the following day
Which gives us a 49.5% chance of victory
Instead of a 66% chance if he does kill me
so, mole, please give the official night plan for us 4 before we lynch mole, as i believe we all agree that is in our best interests
Essentially, you are saying, it is fine for BD to only lynch one unseen and their own convert immune roles because they can win as Unseen
Sure lol
If you have a realistic chance of winning in your own faction it is definitely game throwing to purposefully go against it. It is up to @eevee to decide what constitutes “Realistic” in this scenario, and they need to speak up. I know I’m still dead but I already broke it so one more won’t matter.
@eevee Would you consider it gamethrowing for Butler to not block MM and Priest to not revive Priest tonight?
Obviously Eevee understands where we’re coming from lol
Recommendation: ignore the question
I’ve made my point. IF BD capitualate, I’m calling BS if you lynch me
i believe we can hang mole now if we wish
Like I said, you lose as long as BD don’t gamethrow if you kill me