abstaining isn’t voting for an execution
Here is why I included abstaining:
“Hey, lets vote the king! I vote guilty, everyone else abstains”
Balance around the game not the hypothetical tactics
1.Possible tactics are part of the game. The “Let’s kill the King Day 2 because that is good for BD” tactic that makes it impossible for a Neutral King to win is a tactic that is already being used, and its presence is bad, plain and simple. If Blue Dragon can circumvent this by making one of their members- or better, one suspect person who might not even be BD- lynchkill the possible BD king, then this change is worth exactly nothing.
2.Everyone who abstained could have voted Not Guilty, and because they did not the King died, they are still responsible for the death of the King.
With this change, you no longer vote up the King just because he might somehow be guilty but only if you
- can afford to have Grief, and are slightly suspicious, and have no other leads
- think that the King is actually not Good.
What are the odds of this working now that the loyalty passive is in play?
66.6% chance to not be on your side, all kings bus one scum to not get voted. it’s would make the most mathematical sense to lynch him D4. The king needs a buff to protect it’s self from a lynch happy BD
Oh boy
I feel like I just got assigned math homework
It’s due Friday. You will be graded baised on your work and your answer. The test is next week.
The answer is, we’re about to find out
Maybe then somebody will listen to me on King lol