Hunter’s retribution ability counts the first accuse of the entire day, not of the of the current round of votes that gets the hunter up.
We had a game where a suspicious person offered to be the first to accuse to prove his point.
We all pardoned and he was accused but it didn’t kill him, it killed the previous person.
This feels like a bug.
If it’s the intended behavior then the wording of Retribution should be changed.
Trying to understand which way you mean it went (bob being the hunter in these examples)
Jane accuses bob. They vote to pardon bob. Sam accuses bob, they execute jane dies.
With that version it is a bit silly but I don’t see it as misleading mechanically.
On the other hand. if you mean
Jane accuses mary, mary accuses bob. bob is executed. Jane dies. Then yes that is just plain broken and needs fixed.
no, he is saying:
mary accuse bob. sally accuse bob. mary unaccuse bob. bob is executed, sally dies (I think)
King accuses Hunter. Hunter gets on the stand. Everybody pardons. Hunter returns to the table.
Paladin says that he’s sure the Hunter is evil and will take the arrow on the King’s behalf.
Everybody re-votes the Hunter up the stand with Paladin accusing first.
King dies.
If this is the intended behavior the text for retribution should be changed.
Currently:
Retribution: If found guilty of treason, kill your accuser before your execution.
Suggested:
Retribution: If found guilty of treason, kill the first person to accuse you that day.
