Opinion Thread: The Fool (ToL)

#181

fac·tion1

/ˈfakSH(ə)n/
noun

a small organized dissenting group within a larger one

1 Like
#182

aka NK really isn’t tbh

#183

Nk isn’t organized yeah

#184

NK is a faction yes
But Fool isn’t
Are we talking about Fool or arent we

#185

Was continuing from my previous post

#186

What is the difference, exactly?

#187

NK can’t win with the other factions. He needs to kill all other factions.
Fool is factionless.

#188

NK is not a faction any more than Fool is

NK must die for BD to win

Ergo to imply that BD’s wincon is expressly compatible with Fool is incorrect

1 Like
#189

Fake logic

1 Like
#190

They’re both factionless

#191

On one hand, yes

On the other, the point stands regardless

#192

Fool is a faction of 1. The fool’s faction’s goal is to be publically executed. Just because it’s a sub-group doesn’t mean it has to see other subgroups lose.

#193

Any faction can win with the fool together… and you have no idea how often I executed Fools on purpose already

No, neutrals aren’t factions
Faction win con = must kill all other factions, and no other faction can win with them together

#194

NK falls under category of any neutral who seeks you harm

#195

And fool doesnt

#196

In fact NK is the only class which falls under “neutral who seeks you harm”
It’s synonyms

#197

What is a Sellsword?

#198

You don’t have to kill a Sellsword to win as BD

#199

And even if we take the game’s decisions on that front as gospel, why does that make Fool a good thing for the BD and help them achieve their win condition?

#200

It doesn’t have to be good or bad for wincon